AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Usha Chalasani

ESL67 · ENGL1A · ENGLISH1A · 265W · ESL67W · ESL265 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

She is usually worth taking for students who want patient guidance, but online students should .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatientKnowledgeableHelpfulClear lecturesMixed online organization
  • Most students praise her patience, knowledge, and and ENGL courses.
  • Grades are generally fair, with lenient due dates and , but not much .
  • A few strong negative reviews cite confusion, poor online Canvas use, or difficulty understanding her.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Students often earn solid grades with help, make-up chances, and flexible due dates, but essays, reading, and .

Online reviews mention catch-up opportunities but also assignment confusion, while and some grading strictness.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

67/100

The material is usually manageable because and supports language learners, though some students found the class confusing.

, while online reviews are split between helpful teaching and Canvas confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters appears repeatedly, but reviews do .

Both online and in-person reviews mention participation, but neither format clearly proves a .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend her because , and willing to support students.

, while online recommendations are positive but weakened by one severe organization complaint.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

Due dates and , but students also report no and some harsh grading.

Format shift

Online reviews support catch-up chances, while and harsher grading comments.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The course involves reading, essays, and assignments, but most students do not describe the workload as overwhelming.

Format shift

, while in-person evidence is more balanced.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most reviews describe her as patient, knowledgeable, helpful, and .

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is broadly positive but has older severe complaints, while online evidence is positive except for .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews mention quizzes, tests, essays, assignments, reading, and and coursework.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, tests, and assignment confusion, while and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, patience, and care, but older negative reviews report confusion and harsh experiences.

Main concern

A minority of students found her hard to understand or .

What students said

“her lectures are easy to understand very easy to learn from”
ENGL1A
“You can't understand the instructor 90% of the time.”
ESL67W

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are mostly positive about her patience and knowledge, but and missed assignments.

Main concern

Online organization can be confusing when assignments are not clearly posted or explained.

What students said

“She gives us an opportunity to catch up with our missing work.”
ENGL1A
“ so it was a current struggle of emailing her”
ENGLISH1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests, but they do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam rules, or open-book policy.

Quizzes and tests mentionedExam policy unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

In-person exam policy unclear

Online

but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Quizzes and tests mentionedOnline exam policy unclear
“ .”
ENGL1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Understands the difficulties that students undergo. I like her .”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Understands the difficulties that students undergo. I like her .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“ day”

⚖️

64/100

“She was lenient about due dates and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has excellent knowledge about the subject matter, and she has lot of patience.
  • her lectures are easy to understand very easy to learn from
  • She has tons of knowledge, and I like her teaching methods.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She was lenient about due dates and .
  • Shes a and doesnt offer .
  • She gives us an opportunity to catch up with our missing work.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization Issues

  • so it was a current struggle of emailing her
  • You can't understand the instructor 90% of the time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 16 reviews span many years and include both positive and negative detailed experiences across online and in-person formats.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGL1A6 reviews
ESL674 reviews
265W2 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
ESL2651 review
Show 1 more courses
ESL67W1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 2 · A- 2

B range

7

B+ 5 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1