AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Chamroeun Yann

CHDEV39 · CD37A · CHDEV20 · CD39 · CFS134 · PSYCHOLOGY39 · CD20 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you value a caring professor and , and assignments.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and supportivePassionate lecturesClear feedbackReading and writing heavySometimes disorganized
  • Most students praise her care, passion, and willingness to support students who communicate.
  • Grades are usually reachable, but several reviews .
  • Online reviews are positive but reading-heavy, while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

A grades are common and appears often, but students still , and the need to monitor grading.

, while in-person evidence shows both easy passes and tougher workload complaints.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The and practical, but some students find the , and lecture-test mismatch challenging.

Online reviews call the tests or class easy but reading-heavy, while because lectures and organization affect difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Attendance and participation matter in many reviews, but she is often described as .

In-person reviews mention participation and not missing class more often, while online reviews focus more on logging in and completing work.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend her because she is caring, passionate, and and workload.

Both formats are mostly positive, but in-person reviews include and disorganization.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

She offers and support, but several students describe tough grading or needing to ensure grades are fair.

Format shift

Online reviews mention clear criteria and , while and complaints about grading or low points.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Many students say the work is manageable, but , and .

Format shift

Online workload is mainly reading, discussions, and papers, while , and writing.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most , and engaging lectures, though some students find her unclear or disorganized.

Format shift

Online reviews consistently praise her support, while because lecture clarity and organization vary by student.

Assessment method

Balanced

54/100

Reviews mention quizzes, exams, , and group activities rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize quizzes, tests, discussions, and papers, while , and written work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly enthusiastic about her lectures and support, but a minority call the .

Main concern

Some in-person students report , and lots of observations or writing.

What students said

“She makes the to turn in.”
CHDEV39
“I did more work in this one class than I did in all others combined.”
CD39

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students describe a caring professor with manageable but and .

Main concern

Online and weekly posts or papers.

What students said

“The and not difficult.”
PSYCHOLOGY39
“Discussion post every week as well as .”
CHDEV20

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest generally manageable tests and quizzes, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring rules, or a .

Text-Based TestsEasy Exams MentionedQuizzes May Not Match TextbookNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Easy Exams MentionedConfusing Exams MentionedTricky Tests Mentioned
“ .”
CD39
“ as she gives study guides and .”
CD39

Online

, and tests but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Text-Based TestsQuizzes MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“The and not difficult.”
PSYCHOLOGY39
“ , but most answers can be found online anyway.”
CHDEV39

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Yann's so passionate & it truly shows through her lectures/work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Amazing lectures and ! She is one of the !”

📚 Workload Reality

52/100

“I did more work in this one class than I did in all others combined.”

⚖️

62/100

“You must stay on top of making sure you are graded fairly with her.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Class was engaging & inspiring.
  • Her lectures are really fun.
  • Disorganized and lectures don't always correlate to what's on the tests so make sure you understand the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy pass, but not ideal for a foundational education in child development.
  • It was very easy to understand. Does not give tons of work.
  • She can be a particular.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • and passionate and wants everyone to do well as we are working with children!
  • She is very understanding when personal things prevent coming to class or work getting turned in.
  • Ready to help you in anyway possible JUST COMMUNICATE.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 31 reviews across many years, with detailed and mostly consistent , and organization.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CD399 reviews
CHDEV207 reviews
CHDEV396 reviews
CD203 reviews
CD37A3 reviews
Show 2 more courses
PSYCHOLOGY392 reviews
CFS1341 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 4 · A 7 · A- 2

B range

8

B+ 4 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1