AI Rate Professor

Art

Timothy Hernandez

ART3 · ART15CERAMICS · ART10 · ART7 · ART20CERAMICS · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if and can handle tough, sometimes subjective grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHelpful CritiquesTough GraderCreative ProjectsBeginner UnfriendlyAttendance Matters
  • Students , and care, especially when they apply critiques.
  • Grades can be tough or subjective, so effort and artistic fit matter a lot.
  • Online reviews are more mixed and mention confusion, while and participation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A grades are possible, but students repeatedly say he is a and that and not slacking.

Online evidence includes late-credit flexibility but confusion, while and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

The art work is manageable for engaged students but .

Online reviews report more confusion, while challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

In-person reviews mention participation, random quizzes, and , while .

; online reviews do not clearly prove a strict attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Most students recommend him for creativity and , but and clarity limit enthusiasm.

, while online reviews are more mixed and warn about confusion.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Multiple students call him a tough grader or say grading feels subjective, even though effort and .

Format shift

Both formats mention grading pressure, with tough grading.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload is not described as overwhelming, but , and applying critiques.

Format shift

Online , while in-person workload centers on participation and studio effort.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

, and care, but several students report confusion or disengagement.

Format shift

Online teaching is more uneven, while as hands-on and engaging.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews , and occasional quizzes rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-centered, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a creative, hands-on professor who challenges students and .

Main concern

taste.

What students said

“Super fun and engaging but not an easy A.”
ART20CERAMICS
“Don't skip class though. and .”
ART20CERAMICS
“ .”
ART10

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with strong praise for understanding and feedback but and beginner difficulty.

Main concern

and hard for beginners.

What students said

“Took this class 100% online, would not recommend .”
ART3
“This is not a good class for beginners and would only be manageable if you are experienced in art haha.”
ART10
“Online has been hard but he's made it easier”
ART7

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention random quizzes but do not clearly prove any exam, proctoring, open-book, webcam, midterm, or .

Random QuizzesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove closed-book exams, midterms, finals, or proctoring requirements.

Random QuizzesReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“ and .”
ART20CERAMICS

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Super fun and engaging but not an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Not only is the course clear and planned out but the professor is always there to help if you need it.”

⚖️

35/100

“He grades pieces tough but fair.”

💻 Online Experience

46/100

“Took this class 100% online, would not recommend .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He is very invested in his students, and genuinely cares about teaching proper techniques and gets hands on.
  • Gives hands on guidance & fuels creativity in his students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He's a though but if and stuff you can improve.
  • Super fun and engaging but not an easy A.
  • .

Theme 3

🧑‍🎨 About Fit & Format

  • This is not a good class for beginners and would only be manageable if you are experienced in art haha.
  • Online has been hard but he's made it easier
  • Participate in all classes, and you will earn the grade you work for.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews across online and , and reasonably consistent evidence over many years.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART20CERAMICS7 reviews
ART103 reviews
ART32 reviews
ART15CERAMICS1 review
ART71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1