AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Marybeth Miller

CHDEV38 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
4/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you can handle a very heavy online workload and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderOverwhelming WorkloadVague InstructionsNot Recommended
  • All six reviews are online and strongly negative.
  • Students describe heavy weekly assignments and .
  • Several students .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

5/100

Students say even strong performance and journals and observations.

All evidence comes from online reviews, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course content may be manageable, but vague instructions and .

, so the difficulty evidence reflects the online class.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews mention participation matters but do not clearly prove a .

Online reviews mention participation pressure, while there are .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

Students because of and workload.

All recommendation evidence is from online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

3/100

Students repeatedly describe severe deductions and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

, and many assignments.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students describe vague instructions, poor experience, and little value for the workload.

Format shift

Only online teaching evidence is available.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention tests along with frequent papers, observations, journals, discussions, and assignments.

Format shift

Assessment evidence comes only from online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews consistently describe unclear instructions, excessive weekly work, and .

Main concern

Students report and .

What students said

“ .”
CHDEV38
“She holds extremely high standards and imposes an overwhelming workload”
CHDEV38
“Do NOT RECCOMEND.”
CHDEV38

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, or open-book policy.

Tests MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove the .

Tests MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Every week you had to a discussion, an observation (interview) someone or multiple people, a test, and a paper due”
CHDEV38

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“Instructions were vague and .”

⚖️

3/100

“She marks you off for the littlest things and .”

📚 Workload Pressure

5/100

“She holds extremely high standards and imposes an overwhelming workload”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Every week you had to a discussion, an observation (interview) someone or multiple people, a test, and a paper due on 5 topics from the chapter.
  • She holds extremely high standards and imposes an overwhelming workload
  • Lots of homework

Theme 2

⚖️

  • .
  • It does not matter how much you read or think you will do good in it .
  • She marks you off for the littlest things and .

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • I don't reccomend.
  • I WOULD NOT take her class .
  • Let me be the first to .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent online reviews are detailed and and workload.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CHDEV386 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1