AI Rate Professor

Music Performance

Melissa Wolfmann

OPERAMUSICAL · MUS24 · MUS12 · MUS3 · OPERAWORKSHOP · MUS39C · MUS66 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

, but be cautious with online appreciation courses.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyExcellent Voice CoachCaring In PersonHelpful FeedbackOnline Communication ProblemsHeavy Online Reading
  • In-person performance classes are strongly praised for , and encouragement.
  • Online MUS12 reviews describe poor communication, little teaching presence, and .
  • Getting an A is realistic in person if students participate and show up, but online evidence is much weaker.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

participation and attendance, while online MUS12 required heavy self-directed work.

Evidence for easy , while online reviews show more effort and frustration.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, but music appreciation can be hard for non-majors and online students.

In-person classes are guided and supportive, while online and Connect work.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as formally mandatory, but reviews say showing up is central to success.

In-person reviews stress showing up and participating, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

, but online students report poor communication and lack of teaching presence.

Recommendation is high for in-person voice and workshop classes but low for the two online MUS12 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

In-person students often report A grades when they participate, though because of one-attempt work.

Format shift

Leniency is supported mainly by in-person reviews, while online .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload varies, with and online MUS12 described as and weekly questions.

Format shift

Online workload appears heavy, while .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Her in-person coaching is praised as caring and effective, but online students describe weak communication and little instruction.

Format shift

Teaching quality is excellent in person and poor online based on the supplied reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and in-class exams rather than one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Online evidence centers on Connect reading questions, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are very positive, especially for voice coaching, support, and .

Main concern

Students still need to attend and participate consistently.

What students said

“ , and you'll get an A.”
MUS66
“Even if you've never sung before, or don't have much experience, she really works with you.”
MUS39C

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe an , and limited direct teaching.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves and .

What students said

“Completely absent.”
MUS12
“There were or discussions; we had to read and do 200 questions every week through connect with only one attempt”
MUS12

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, but and answers are reviewed before exam day.

In-Class ExamsAnswers Reviewed Before ExamOnline Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

before exam day.

In-Class ExamsAnswers Reviewed Before Exam
“In class exams, but goes .”
MUS-3

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Even if you've never sung before, or don't have much experience, she really works with you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting format differences in teaching, workload, and grades. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She's very down to earth and straightforward, and .”

👍 Recommendation Pattern

78/100

“ my life!”

⚠️ Online Risk

35/100

“There were or discussions; we had to read and do 200 questions every week through connect with only one attempt”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a super amazing teacher; I'm always amazed and impressed by the way she can work with us in workshops and use techniques and advice to help us improve in leaps and bounds.
  • She's helpful, considerate, kind, talented, everything you want in a professor.
  • She's very easy to get along with and pretty laid back too.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Effort

  • The only way you can fail is if you refuse to sing (um, hello, you're in a singing class?) or don't show up.
  • , and you'll get an A.
  • if you pay attention and show up for class.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Class

  • Completely absent.
  • They're nice but this class doesn't seem to be a priority since they let the book do all the teaching

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across many years give consistent in-person praise and , though some older comments are brief.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MUS663 reviews
MUS-32 reviews
MUS122 reviews
MUS242 reviews
MUS39C2 reviews
Show 2 more courses
OPERAMUSICAL1 review
OPERAWORKSHOP1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1