AI Rate Professor

Economics

Gita Srinivasan

ECON1A · ECON40AND50 · ECON1B · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you are disciplined, comfortable teaching yourself online, and can keep up with every graded task.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor CommunicationHeavy Online WorkloadTough GraderTest HeavyMcGraw Hill Reliance
  • Most , and weak support, especially online.
  • Grades can be possible with discipline, but many students say small missed items or .
  • The class relies , and participation rather than strong direct teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

A few students found an easy path, but , and missed tasks make an A hard to secure.

Online evidence contains both easy-grade claims and strong warnings, while and poor support.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The economics content is not described as impossible, but confusing videos, scattered materials, and .

Online reviews give the clearest evidence of mixed ease, while and support.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Participation and as required and grade-sensitive.

and attendance through Blackboard posting, while in-person-counted reviews do not clarify attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and the class depends heavily on external materials.

Online reviews are mixed but lean negative, while and less detailed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call her a and say small missed discussion or .

Format shift

Online evidence gives the strongest grading complaints, while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews mention lots of , and many graded items.

Format shift

Online reviews show heavy recurring work, while in-person-counted reviews also .

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students often , and McGraw Hill, and gives limited help.

Format shift

Online reviews give the strongest communication complaints, and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tests and quizzes are repeatedly described as a major part of the and discussions.

Format shift

Online reviews clearly emphasize tests and quizzes, while and test-heavy tags.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and also complain about online-style setup, weak communication, and McGraw Hill dependence.

Main concern

The comments often describe an online setup despite being counted as in person.

What students said

“Mcgraw hill is basically our class.”
ECON1B
“She does not respond to emails or .”
ECON1B
“Worst teacher ever, can't understand her, and !”
ECON1A

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but mostly warn and tests, and strict participation requirements.

Main concern

Small missed assignments or .

What students said

“ .”
ECON1B
“ , if you miss one, goodbye to your grade!”
ECON1A
“72% of your and quizzes.”
ECON1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course appears test- and quiz-heavy, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book status, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring rules.

Test HeavyWeekly QuizzesMidterm MentionedFinal MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam format, book policy, or proctoring rules.

Test Heavy
“Test heavy”
ECON1B

Online

, and a final, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Weekly QuizzesMidterm MentionedFinal MentionedTest Heavy
“72% of your and quizzes.”
ECON1B
“ .”
ECON1B
“Test and hw are due weekly by sunday”
ECON40AND50

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“Relies on powerpoints and videos to do the teaching.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ ”

⚖️

18/100

“She is a and you have to work really hard for your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Either takes a week to get a response back or
  • Relies on powerpoints and videos to do the teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , if you miss one, goodbye to your grade!
  • Zero , so you will have to work extremely hard to get this A.
  • I've been putting in next to zero effort and have an A

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload & Materials

  • Mcgraw hill is basically our class.
  • There are weekly quizzes and HW on Connect.
  • 72% of your and quizzes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews across many years provide detailed and fairly consistent complaints, though some older format labels conflict with the review text.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ECON1B11 reviews
ECON1A2 reviews
ECON40AND501 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1