AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Gurinder Khaira

ENGR4 · ENGR2 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you can teach yourself, tolerate heavy workload, and handle shifting deadlines or .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy WorkloadConfusing InstructionTough GraderLecture HeavyDisorganized Course
  • Students repeatedly describe , limited help, and assignments or .
  • Workload is especially severe online, with one review citing 8-10 assignments every week.
  • A small amount of flexibility and exists, but it does not offset the grading and organization problems.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A is possible with or flexibility, but , and unclear support.

, while in-person evidence shows some flexibility but .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course feels harder because lectures are fast or unclear and .

Online reviews emphasize poor course delivery, while and disconnected assignments.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

One student mentions deadline flexibility, but .

In-person reviews provide the attendance-related evidence, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

because the teaching support, workload, and course organization are poor.

Online reviews are consistently negative, while but remain mostly critical.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Multiple tags call him a , and students , and exams beyond study materials.

Format shift

, while online reviews focus more on workload and lack of support.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

The online workload is described as never ending, and and not enough time for assignments.

Format shift

Online workload is the harshest, while and poorly paced.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students often describe low-quality instruction, confusing videos, repeated questions instead of help, and little teaching effort.

Format shift

Both formats criticize teaching, with online reviews stressing missing videos and in-person reviews stressing weak lectures.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews mention assignments, labs, homework, a , and exams, so assessment .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize labs and assignments, while , and a big project.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but mostly negative, , and weak instruction.

Main concern

Students struggle with lecture-heavy teaching, changing deadlines, and assessments that feel disconnected from class.

What students said

“Fast lectures.”
ENGR2
“Constantly changing grades, deadlines, and assignments.”
ENGR2
“Very low-quality instruction!”
ENGR4

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, with complaints about overwhelming workload, missing videos, radio silence, and poor help.

Main concern

Students say the online course demands too much independent work with too little teaching support.

What students said

“The workload is never ending.”
ENGR2
“He rarely ever posts lecture videos.”
ENGR4
“Teaching is his second job and he shows the lack of effort.”
ENGR2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention test-heavy classes and , but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book format.

Midterm MentionedTest HeavyUnclear Exam Alignment

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams with unexpected questions, but do not clearly prove closed-book or strict proctoring rules.

Test HeavyUnexpected Exam Questions
“ the hws or study guides!”
ENGR4
“Test heavy”
ENGR2

Online

Online reviews mention a midterm but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or .

Midterm Mentioned
“ ”
ENGR4

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Very low-quality instruction!”

⚠️ Workload Pressure

12/100

“The workload is never ending.”

👎 Recommendation Risk

15/100

“ . K.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • In lectures, he just reads the .
  • His videos are convoluted and confusing.
  • He rarely ever posts lecture videos.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • There are about 4-5 assignments per lab, and 2 labs due every week with no time in between due dates.
  • Lots of outside .
  • Not .

Theme 3

⚖️ And Exams

  • Constantly changing grades, deadlines, and assignments.
  • the hws or study guides!
  • Had a B+ and the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across 2021-2024 show consistent negative themes, though .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENGR25 reviews
ENGR42 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A- 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1