AI Rate Professor

English

Katherine Luttrell

ENG3 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a and are willing to follow instructions closely.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGreat feedbackExtra credit availableCreative writing assignmentsReading support providedSometimes tough grading
  • Most students praise Luttrell as , and .
  • The class is usually manageable, with provided materials, audio support, and .
  • A and frequent online deadlines.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is realistic with , and steady work, but and deadlines prevent it from being effortless.

Online reviews show more easy-A evidence but also frequent deadlines, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course is approachable because materials are provided and explained clearly, though English writing tasks still require attention.

Online reviews emphasize accessible materials and simple Canvas navigation, while and following instructions.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews , but they do show some flexibility through late-work communication and assignment options.

, though in-person evidence mentions communicating if work will be late.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend her because she is caring, engaging, and .

Online reviews are mostly positive with one strong negative, while and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

helps, but multiple reviews call grading specific or tough, especially when instructions are not followed.

Format shift

Online reviews show both and strict completion standards, while .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Work is manageable but , and frequent online deadlines.

Format shift

Online workload is more clearly documented with multiple weekly due dates, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students repeatedly praise , and engaging assignments.

Format shift

Both formats include strong teaching praise, with online reviews giving more detailed evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears centered on writing , and a final essay rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus on assignments, with online reviews giving the clearest details about essays and creative work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but show strong teaching, provided readings, , and .

Main concern

if students do not follow instructions or communicate late work.

What students said

“Just a really good teacher.”
ENG3
“Shes a but she gives ”
ENG3

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly strong, , and creative assignments, with one warning about frequent deadlines and specific grading.

Main concern

Online students may face frequent due dates and .

What students said

“ , and Sunday.”
ENG3
“ .”
ENG3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a traditional exam policy, and and creative work.

Major EssayCreative AssignmentExtra CreditNo Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or final rules.

TED Talk AssignmentExtra Credit
“I got to write a TED talk.”
ENG3
“Shes a but she gives ”
ENG3

Online

Online reviews mention a final paper, creative assignments, and regular assignments, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Final PaperCreative AssignmentsRegular Assignments
“ ”
ENG3
“We got to make a Ted Talk”
ENG3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“She goes above and beyond.”

⚖️

62/100

“She looks for ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She is awesome!
  • Just a really good teacher.

Theme 2

📝 About Assignments

  • We got to make a Ted Talk
  • she does give the option for written work for those who are shy.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades & Workload

  • there is several opportunities.
  • Shes a but she gives
  • , and Sunday.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews provide useful detail across formats, but the and .

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG38 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1