AI Rate Professor

Business

Janel Carrigan

BA10 · MKTG21 · MKTG14 · MKTG14AND12 · MKTG10 · MTKG12 · MKTANDBUS · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
64.29%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a and can keep up with scheduled participation requirements.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear FeedbackCaring TeacherStructured ModulesParticipation RulesEasy Marketing Courses
  • Most students , and caring support.
  • Grades are usually very achievable if students follow modules, read, and meet participation timing rules.
  • Online reviews are more polarized because discussion-board scheduling and strict deadlines hurt flexibility.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A is very realistic when students complete the regular work, follow instructions, and meet participation timing rules.

In-person reviews sound easier overall, while online A outcomes and deadlines.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Marketing content is repeatedly described as , and easy to follow, with reading and modules doing most of the work.

In-person students call the material simple and fun, while online students mostly find it easy but more schedule-driven.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

, but online participation timing can be rigid and grade-sensitive.

Online evidence shows low flexibility due to multi-day discussion rules, while but helpful.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

and feedback, though online students with tight schedules may struggle with rigid participation rules.

, while online reviews are split by whether students tolerate the structure.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

and achievable, but online discussion rules and picky .

Format shift

as fair and easy, while online grading has more complaints about strict participation details.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload is steady with discussions, quizzes, reading, short papers, and assignments, but most students call it manageable.

Format shift

Online workload feels heavier because work must be posted on specific days, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students consistently praise her feedback, caring attitude, real-world examples, and clear class organization.

Format shift

, while online reviews include both strong praise and complaints about limited direct teaching.

Assessment method

Balanced

54/100

Assessment , and exams rather than relying on only one format.

Format shift

Online reviews mention discussions and assignments more often, while , and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews are strongly , and engaging real-world examples.

Main concern

Some students still say there is a lot of .

What students said

“Subject material is simple; quizzes follow each chapter; and .”
MKTG14
“ , but I wouldn't suggest missing too much.”
MKTG10
“EASY EASY EASY.”
BA10

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and manageable, but several students complain about rigid discussion timing, strict deadlines, and less flexibility.

Main concern

days, which can punish otherwise good work.

What students said

“ and you never feel .”
MKTG10
“DB's have to be done three times a week on different days each.”
MKTG10
“If you put in effort, you'll get an A.”
MKTG14

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest standard quizzes and exams with generally fair preparation, but no clear evidence proves open-book rules or proctoring requirements.

QuizzesExams Based On ReviewsOnline Tests MentionedFair Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

63/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams tied to quizzes, lectures, or reviews, but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

Fair TestsExam ReviewQuizzes
“Her lectures are super fun, and the .”
MTKG12
“ and ”
MKTG14

Online

Online reviews mention tests and exams, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Online Tests MentionedExams Mentioned
“ and were flawed”
MKTG21
“If you do all the work and .”
MKTG14

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you show up to and participate, I can't see not getting an A!”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Mrs. Carrigan has a certain way of teaching material to a real world perspective and really engaging her students to learn in an amazing way.”

📈 Easy Grade Path

88/100

“If you put in effort, you'll get an A.”

⏰ Online Structure

58/100

“This class does not provide the online flexibility I'm use to.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is an amazing professor and wants her students to do well.
  • She made it super fun and I felt I learned ALOT even though it was 100% online.
  • She gives a lot of feedback and if something goes wrong with your black board she doesn't give you an automatic zero she gives you a chance to fix it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very easy class.
  • Super easy. its all vocab and .
  • Great teacher but definitely a class you have to read a lot of the chapter, very easy classes but a lot of work to be successful.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Rules

  • DB's have to be done three times a week on different days each.
  • You could do an excellent job, cover the topic brilliantly, but god forbid you mess up and post on two days instead of three, you end up with a 50% for the assignment.
  • Not time flexible!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 25 reviews across many years, both formats, repeated courses, and detailed comments with consistent themes.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MKTG107 reviews
MKTG146 reviews
MTKG124 reviews
BA103 reviews
MKTG213 reviews
Show 2 more courses
MKTANDBUS1 review
MKTG14AND121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 3 · A 10

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1