AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Carolyn Stevenson

RN32A · RN32AND32A · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

if you want a demanding but and practice.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but toughStrong feedbackStrict skills standardsParticipation mattersAccessible outside class
  • Students consistently describe her as excellent, caring, and focused on success.
  • She is strict about nursing skills and safety, but students see the strictness as useful.
  • Grades are very strong when students attend, practice, and follow the checklist.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

A grades are common, but , and careful skills preparation.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

She supports new nursing students well, but the clinical skill standards and safety expectations keep the course from being effortless.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Multiple reviews say participation matters and one explicitly warns that skipping class leads to failure.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and committed to helping them improve.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

She is strict on skills and criteria, but students earn high grades when they meet expectations.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload centers on practice, checklists, skills lab, and care plans rather than busywork.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Reviews consistently describe her as , and effective despite an intimidating first impression.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments emphasize skills checkoffs, checklists, care plans, participation, and practice rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

as caring, helpful, and strict in a productive way.

Main concern

Students must attend, practice skills, and follow checklists closely.

What students said

“THE !!! Learned so much from her.”
RN32A
“Show up, pay ", and you will pass easily.”
RN32A
“ class.”
RN32AND32A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the finals.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews discuss skills checkoffs and practice but .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“THE !!! Learned so much from her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“She wants you to learn and succeed.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“If you get her for the first semester, you're really lucky.”

⚖️

65/100

“Stick to the exact criteria for skills check off.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • THE !!! Learned so much from her.
  • She comes off intimidating and tough but she's such a sweet person!
  • class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Show up, pay ", and you will pass easily.
  • Memorize the skills checklist, and how to do it.
  • She definitely wants you to be a safe nurse so she pushes you to be as perfect as you can be!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She wants you to learn and succeed.
  • she does her best to help you improve your weak areas
  • Glad i got her out of other instructors

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across several years are detailed, consistent, and supported by grades and repeated themes.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

RN32A4 reviews
RN32AND32A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 4 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values