AI Rate Professor

English

David Campos

ENGL12541736 · ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENGLISH1A · ENG125 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
73.33%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want a demanding writing class and can handle heavy work, participation, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLots Of WritingTough GraderStrong FeedbackParticipation MattersMixed Teaching
  • Campos can help motivated students become and office hours.
  • The class often , and steady homework.
  • Student experiences are polarized, with some calling him inspiring and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

An A is possible, but comments repeatedly say students must keep up with writing, reading, participation, and .

The single online review suggests fair grading, while and more inconsistent path to an A.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The course is intellectually demanding because , and college-level writing standards.

Online evidence sounds manageable, but course.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Several in-person comments say attendance or participation affects success, and .

; the online review does not clarify attendance flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and writing growth, but many warn about workload, grading, and unclear or negative experiences.

The online review is clearly positive, while and serious complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Many reviews call him a tough grader, though some , and fair grading.

Format shift

, while in-person evidence frequently describes strict or .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and substantial in-class work.

Format shift

Online workload is not described as heavy, but and reading.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Teaching reviews are polarized, with some students praising growth and feedback while others describe lectures as boring or unhelpful.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is positive, while negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Grades appear driven mostly by essays, writing assignments, homework, reading, participation, drafts, and presentations rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and of papers and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are sharply mixed, combining strong writing improvement with heavy work and .

Main concern

Expect lots of , and possible frustration with .

What students said

“The class does have a lottt of writing to do.”
ENGL1A
“he is cool as a person but a ”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review is strongly positive and , and .

Main concern

Only , so online confidence is limited.

What students said

“Even though it was online he had many lectures made to help teach the materials.”
ENGLISH1A
“He is a and .”
ENGLISH1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the rules, and the course appears mostly assignment based.

Exam Policy Not Clearly ProvenAssignment Heavy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove the normal exam policy or format.

Midterm Date MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“ "”
ENG1A

Online

The online review does not clearly .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you wanna be a better writer and challenge yourself then go ahead and take his class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“Very good at what he teaches, genuinely made me a better writer.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“Be prepared for lots of work in class and homework.”

⚖️

34/100

“Yeah, he can grade tough, but he can tell if you try.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Campos was actually a good teacher.
  • lectures were boring and didn't help me at all
  • Cool guy as a person but didn't learn at all in class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class does have a lottt of writing to do.
  • He provides many opportunities to earn good grades but you have to work for it.
  • Through out the semester people would come to me for because they thought I wrote well but David thought otherwise and I never got higher than an .

Theme 3

📝

  • he was really patient with me when I turned in papers late and allowed them for .
  • He is a and .
  • He explained how to expand an .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen reviews across many years provide enough detail to show a consistent pattern of heavy workload and polarized student outcomes.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG1A7 reviews
ENGL1A6 reviews
ENG1253 reviews
ENGL125417361 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

9

B+ 4 · B 5

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1