AI Rate Professor

Art

Ricardo Rivera

ART4 · ART52 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take him only if you can , and some unclear instructions.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture heavyMixed clarityTime consuming projectsHelpful on projectsStrict attendance
  • and repetitive, draining lectures.
  • Online reviews warn about vague instructions and weak communication, though one says passing is easy.
  • Grades can be good, but , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Good grades are possible, but students still report required attendance, participation, and .

Online evidence suggests easier passing, while and project effort.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

The art content is not described as conceptually hard, but repeated lectures and .

Online difficulty comes from unclear setup, while and large projects.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and participation matter a lot for the grade.

The , while online has one warning that skipping class hurts passing.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students are split between calling him caring and helpful and .

Online reviews are less favorable overall, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Grades can be strong, but few major graded items and .

Format shift

Online comments mention easy passing and , while and major assignments.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Projects and assignments are described as fun but very time consuming, with lecture time adding fatigue.

Format shift

In-person workload sounds heavier, while online .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

He can be helpful and caring, but , and weak online organization hurt the experience.

Format shift

Online teaching is criticized for vague instructions, while and draining.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize projects, writing, participation, and a .

Format shift

Both formats point mainly to projects and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

lectures that students found exhausting.

Main concern

Lecture fatigue, attendance pressure, and .

What students said

“MUST show up, attendance is a big part of your grade.”
ART4
“This class was a breeze and I am not good with computers!”
ART52

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed to negative because assignments and though passing may be manageable.

Main concern

Vague instructions and .

What students said

“ and .”
ART52
“Easy to pass.”
ART4

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, midterms, finals, or proctoring policies.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, format, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Instructor has a , and he is fun to listen to.”

⚠️ Online Clarity

45/100

“ .”

📌

18/100

“MUST show up, attendance is a big part of your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Repeats info of Formal elements and Constructed Meaning every class.
  • He is so kind, helpful and caring towards his students!

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • , but VERY time consuming.
  • Easy to pass.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • .
  • Instructions given to .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across several years give useful patterns, but opinions are polarized and course formats differ.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART44 reviews
ART523 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1