AI Rate Professor

Journalism

Jeremy Martin

JOURN1 · JOURN0000 · JOUR1 · JOURNALISM15 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a useful journalism class and are ready to read, participate, and study for difficult tests.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear but reading-heavyHard tests and pop quizzesDiscussion-focusedHelpful when engaged
  • Most students describe him as a strong journalism instructor who makes class interesting when students participate.
  • The course , and .
  • Online reviews are very positive, while because of workload and test difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

63/100

An A is realistic with effort, reading, and participation, but and .

Online evidence is more forgiving, while , and quizzes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The content is manageable, but frequent reading, current-events discussion, and .

Online reviews make the course sound more approachable, while and harder assessments.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Attendance appears important because participation, discussions, and quizzes affect success, but .

Online evidence centers on participation, while hurts performance.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend him because he teaches clearly and makes journalism useful, despite workload concerns.

Online reviews are fully positive, while and a few serious complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Grading seems fair with some and help available, but and one tough-grader complaint limit leniency.

Format shift

Online reviews mention clear expectations and flexibility, while but .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students repeatedly , and , so the workload is heavier than average.

Format shift

Online workload sounds lighter, while , and test preparation.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most reviews praise his clarity, helpfulness, and class discussions, though a few call him unprepared or uncaring.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is positive, while but more polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

The course uses reading, papers, participation, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes participation and assignments, while and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students often praise his teaching, but , and workload.

Main concern

Tests, quizzes, and lot of work.

What students said

“ and youll get an A.”
JOURN1
“The , so study hard!”
JOURN1
“But class was just too much work to enjoy.”
JOURN1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students report a and some flexibility.

Main concern

Students still need to participate and keep up with reading.

What students said

“I think all he really wants from you is to say what you think and back it up.”
JOURN1
“The professor gives you extra .”
JOUR1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and surprise or frequent quizzes, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser.

Hard TestsPop QuizzesReading-Based Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

46/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and reading-based quizzes.

Hard TestsPop QuizzesReading-Based Quizzes
“The , so study hard!”
JOURN1
“he gives random quizzes on chapters you were supposed to read at home.”
JOURN1
“His tests and if you slack off and don't read or understand the material.”
JOUR1

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the final format.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hes a really great teacher , just make sure you read .”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“he actually makes sure you understand what youre being taught and its not just a waste of time.”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“This class had a lot of homework and .)”

👍 Recommendation Value

78/100

“Great instructor and class. It inspired me to watch the news more closely and have more knowledge.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He was amazing.
  • , and funny (in his own way).

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and youll get an A.
  • The , so study hard!
  • Plenty of offered if .

Theme 3

📚

  • Read chapters as assigned because there is a so.
  • he gives random quizzes on chapters you were supposed to read at home.
  • This class had a lot of homework and book reading

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across many years give consistent , and workload.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

JOURN19 reviews
JOUR12 reviews
JOURN00001 review
JOURNALISM151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values