AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mindy Copeland

MATH11 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can handle constant work and possible communication friction, because the online reviews are strongly divided and often negative.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHomework heavyTest heavyMixed supportRude tone complaintsOrganized Canvas
  • Online students repeatedly , and negative communication experiences.
  • and describes her as knowledgeable, caring, and accessible.
  • The material itself may not be hard, but the workload and instructor tone make the experience risky.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

A grades are possible, but students describe tons of , and the need to study constantly.

, while the single in-person review also says the material is heavy.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The math material is described as not hard by one student, but the pace and workload make the class feel demanding.

Online comments separate manageable material from heavy workload; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a .

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is low because several online students call her rude and .

Online reviews lean negative, while the but too limited to outweigh them.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Tags repeatedly include Tough grader, and students describe frequent exams and .

Format shift

Online evidence supports strict grading pressure, while .

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Multiple students describe tons of , and studying nearly constantly.

Format shift

Online workload evidence is strongly heavy; the in-person review also calls the class heavy on material.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Reviews split sharply between helpful and accommodating versus rude, disrespectful, and one of the .

Format shift

Online teaching experience is mostly negative, while the .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Comments and tags repeatedly mention frequent exams and .

Format shift

; in-person evidence does not specify assessment format.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The and says she is caring, knowledgeable, and accommodating despite heavy material.

Main concern

The class is still heavy on material.

What students said

“Mindy is a professor who knows what she's talking about, and .”
MATH11

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online , and several serious complaints about rude or disrespectful communication.

Main concern

The biggest issue is workload intensity combined with poor communication tone in negative reviews.

What students said

“ , and , but over all not a bad class, just be studying 24/7.”
MATH11
“ .”
MATH11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The main exam risk is frequent testing, but reviews do not clearly prove .

Frequent ExamsTest HeavyReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , quiz format, proctoring, or .

Online

Online reviews clearly mention frequent exams and test-heavy structure, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Frequent ExamsTest Heavy
“ , and , but over all not a bad class, just be studying 24/7.”
MATH11
“Test heavy”
MATH11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and , but over all not a bad class, just be studying 24/7.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“ .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ hard. However, as an instructor, she isn't the best”

👍 Recommendation Rate

38/100

“I dont reccomend Mindy.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • and she's rude.
  • , and , but over all not a bad class, just be studying 24/7.
  • Work was obviously load heavy but that was expected.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Instructor Style

  • She was really disrespectful to me whenever I would send heart-felt emails...
  • Very accommodating.
  • Mindy is a professor who knows what she's talking about, and .

Theme 3

🧪

  • Test heavy
  • and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Six recent reviews provide useful evidence, but and sharply polarized experiences limit confidence.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH116 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1