AI Rate Professor

Art

Vincent Mendez

ARTSECT · ART7 · CLAAH · CLS20 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
18.18%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Avoid Vincent Mendez unless and teach yourself for a relatively manageable grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganized LecturesBoring ClassEasy TestsPoor CommunicationLecture Heavy
  • , and disorganized lectures despite several comments saying the class or .
  • Grades can be obtainable, but students often feel the teaching quality and communication are poor.
  • The one online review is negative but too short to support detailed format conclusions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students report easy tests and high grades, but disorganization and .

, while the single online review only says he is unorganized.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The content and as easy, but make the course feel harder than it should.

delivery; online evidence is too brief to judge content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews mention showing up and lectures but do not consistently prove a .

In-person reviews imply attendance helps but do not prove strict rules, and online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

because , and disorganized.

Both formats are negative, but the and more detailed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

57/100

Several students earned A-range grades and call tests easy, but , and unclear grade handling.

Format shift

, while the online review does not clarify grading.

Workload

Moderate

53/100

Workload is usually manageable, but , and tedious coursework.

Format shift

, while the online review gives no workload detail.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Most reviews describe him as , and weak at communication despite a few positive comments.

Format shift

, and the single online review also reports disorganization.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

74/100

Comments frequently mention tests, quizzes, long exams, and heavily weighted exams, with some reports and assignments mixed in.

Format shift

and reports, while the online review does not describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews repeatedly describe boring, unclear, lecture-heavy classes with easy tests but poor organization.

Main concern

Students frequently report confusion, tangents, weak communication, and little learning value.

What students said

“The class lectures are super long and boring.”
CLS20
“He has the .”
CLS20
“ . Easy class but REALLY a waste of time and effort.”
ART7

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review .

Main concern

Severe disorganization with too .

What students said

“ ”
CLS20

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear important and sometimes long or challenging, but some students say they are easy if studied for and .

Easy TestsLong ExamsHeavily Weighted ExamsTerminology-Based ExamsPolicy Not Clearly Proved

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as important, sometimes easy from terminology, and sometimes long, challenging, and heavily weighted.

Easy TestsLong ExamsHeavily Weighted ExamsTerminology-Based Exams
“ and heavily weighed.”
CLS20
“ as long as you study because they are mostly terminology he gives you beforehand.”
CLS20
“ .”
ART7

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the , or final format.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proved

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy class but REALLY a waste of time and effort.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“He has the .”

📈 Grade Effort

78/100

“ . Easy class but REALLY a waste of time and effort.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

24/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The class lectures are super long and boring.
  • He has the .
  • very boring professor and not easy to understand becuase he jumps from topic to topic.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • as long as you study because they are mostly terminology he gives you beforehand.
  • Great, friendly guy! and just don't sweat it.
  • he still give me C.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • .
  • You can't even ask about you grades, because he will only confuse you more.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 30 reviews span many years and consistently repeat the same concerns about organization, clarity, and lecture quality.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 510
1 out of 511

Course coverage

CLS2020 reviews
ART78 reviews
ARTSECT1 review
CLAAH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 3 · A 4 · A- 3

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1