AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Roberto Carlos

GRC14 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if and learn independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor CommunicationUnclear InstructionsEasy ContentLittle Feedback
  • Students say the class content is easy but the .
  • , so .
  • Online and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

The class can be easy and includes , but vague expectations and .

Online evidence includes an A+ and easy-class comment, while the and focuses on confusion.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The content is described as easy, but unclear directions and suggests.

Online comments call the class pretty easy, while the course.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students mainly , and missing feedback.

Both online and in-person comments criticize communication, with the in-person review explicitly marked as not taking him again.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Grading appears subjective because match his expectations.

Format shift

Online reviews mention unexplained point deductions, while the .

Workload

Light

72/100

The workload seems manageable, but .

Format shift

Online comments describe an easy class, while the .

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

Students repeatedly say his communication is poor despite slow and understandable lectures in one online review.

Format shift

Online feedback is mixed but negative overall, while the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus on assignments and projects, with one online review .

Format shift

and , while in-person evidence centers on projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and says students struggled to understand project expectations.

Main concern

Students may be pushed into .

What students said

“The entire class struggled with determining what he ”
GRC14

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe an easy class with slow lectures, , and .

Main concern

Students report and .

What students said

“ so if you don't get full credit for an assignment, the reason is up in the air.”
GRC14
“He is overall terrible at communication and it was a headache trying to get through his class.”
GRC14

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but one online review explicitly .

No Midterm

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or policy.

Online

One online review , and reviews do .

No Midterm
“ so that was great.”
GRC14

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is overall terrible at communication and it was a headache trying to get through his class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“His lectures are really slow but very understandable.”

⚠️ Communication Risk

18/100

“The entire class struggled with determining what he ”

📉

32/100

“ so if you don't get full credit for an assignment, the reason is up in the air.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are really slow but very understandable.
  • The communication is horrible, GRC14 is an Adobe Acrobat class w/o prerequisites, yet he has students design logos with MUCH more advanced programs.

Theme 2

📌 About Assignments

  • , and he docks off points just because you didn't design something exactly the way he envisioned it even though we supposedly had creative freedom on the assignments.
  • The entire class struggled with determining what he

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, but the comments are consistent about communication problems.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

GRC143 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values