AI Rate Professor

English

Erinlynn Cook

ENGLI4178 · ENG1A · ENG125 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if and are willing to do meaningful essay work.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyImproves writingCaring supportOne-on-one attentionCollege-level preparation
  • Students consistently say her class makes them stronger writers.
  • The course requires real writing effort but does not look grade-punitive.
  • Evidence is all in person and includes older reviews, so confidence is limited by age.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Grades look strong, but comments focus on writing growth and work rather than an effortless A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The course is approachable because students report major writing improvement, but it still pushes college-level writing skills.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

, and in-person reviews do not address the policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

Students recommend her because the class has lasting value for writing and later coursework.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Reported A and A+ grades suggest grading is favorable when students complete the writing work.

Format shift

This .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload appears essay-focused and meaningful but not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students describe caring support, one-on-one help, and lasting improvement in writing ability.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments center on papers, writing, and essays rather than tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

builds long-term skills through personal attention and practice.

Main concern

Some students may need to ask directly for feedback.

What students said

“I gained insight into becoming a better writer and reader”
ENG1A
“ unless you ask.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or requirements.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I wouldn't be able to write the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“I gained insight into becoming a better writer and reader”

📈 Grade Value

70/100

“Definitely makes you a college level writer.”

❤️ Student Support

84/100

“I liked the small class size and one-on-one attention when necessary.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I liked the small class size and one-on-one attention when necessary.
  • She really gets the class to work but has a very unique teaching style

Theme 2

✍️ About Writing Growth

  • Definitely makes you a college level writer.
  • Couldn't write very well till her class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

There are four consistent in-person reviews, but several are old and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A2 reviews
ENG1251 review
ENGLI41781 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values