AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Ekizian Barton

PHIL1C · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if and writing for an interesting philosophy course.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate teacherReading heavyClear criteriaLots of writingMixed responsiveness
  • Students often like Barton's passion, topics, and lecture support, especially online.
  • The course is reading and writing heavy, with quizzes, discussions, essays, and .
  • The main weakness is delayed communication and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

A grades are common, but students must keep up with , and exams.

Online reviews sound more positive and manageable, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The material is not described as brutal, but the , and course.

Online students often find it manageable, while and multiple tasks.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and online work centers on posted lectures and readings.

Online reviews focus on asynchronous materials, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

75/100

and interesting material, but workload and communication issues create hesitation.

Online recommendations are stronger, while because of grading and email delays.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grades are mostly high and criteria are clear, but there is no in one review and .

Format shift

Online reviews show clear expectations, while in-person reviews include one .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and lecture videos.

Format shift

Both formats are workload heavy, with online reviews stressing reading and writing and , and essays.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students praise his passion, interesting topics, and helpful materials, but responsiveness and .

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is stronger, while and poor responsiveness.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Assessment appears driven , and some exams.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions exams plus reading and writing, while , and an essay.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, discussions, quizzes, and essays, but one review complains about slow email replies and delayed grading.

Main concern

Delayed responses and late grade updates can be frustrating.

What students said

“Lots of .”
PHIL1C
“There was alot of the reading and an essay.”
PHIL1C
“ so grades where never updated on time.”
PHIL1C

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are positive overall, with students praising passion, interesting topics, posted materials, and and writing.

Main concern

Students need to keep up with , and writing.

What students said

“Reading texts and watching the lecture is required to pass the class/exams.”
PHIL1C
“The class isn't hard and I highly suggest if you arent getting something go to his office hours.”
PHIL1C
“watch lecture videos and read the stuff he post.”
PHIL1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams and quizzes connected to readings, but do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book rules.

Exams tied to readingsQuizzes tied to readingsExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove exam format or proctoring rules.

Quizzes tied to readingsExam policy not clearly proven
“Discussion boards and .”
PHIL1C
“ and an essay.”
PHIL1C

Online

Online reviews mention exams tied to readings and lecture videos, but do not .

Exams tied to readingsLecture videos requiredExam policy not clearly proven
“Reading texts and watching the lecture is required to pass the class/exams.”
PHIL1C

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Barton is an understatement, he is super passionate about his work and care about his students academically.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Professor Barton is an understatement, he is super passionate about his work and care about his students academically.”

📚 Workload

35/100

“Reading texts and watching the lecture is required to pass the class/exams.”

👍 Recommendation

75/100

“10/10 would recommend taking this teacher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Barton is an understatement, he is super passionate about his work and care about his students academically.
  • The class isn't hard and I highly suggest if you arent getting something go to his office hours.
  • Uses supplemental videos to help students learn.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of .
  • Lots of writing!
  • There was alot of the reading and an essay.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • the biggest down fall .
  • so grades where never updated on time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across online and but limited evidence, with mostly consistent workload themes and .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1C5 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values