AI Rate Professor

English

Jacklyn Rowley

ENG3 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
53/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can manage an easy online class independently despite possible disorganization and slow communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHelpful with papersEasy workloadDisorganizedSlow responsesUnclear structure
  • Both reviews say the class is manageable and students earned high grades.
  • One student praises her paper help and care, while the other describes major disorganization and .
  • The small review count makes the recommendation uncertain despite easy course content.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Both students earned A-range grades, and one directly says it is easy to pass if you stay on top of the work.

All evidence comes from online reviews because there are no in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

The material and as very easy, with only a .

All course-easiness evidence comes from online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Reviews , and the course evidence is entirely online.

Online reviews do not clearly prove an , and there are no in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split because one student found her helpful while and poor clarity.

All recommendation evidence comes from online reviews and is evenly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

A+ and A- outcomes with , though comments do not describe grading rules in detail.

Format shift

Only online reviews exist, so grading evidence is limited to online English 3 experiences.

Workload

Light

84/100

The workload appears light, with one review citing three papers and another citing very few assignments.

Format shift

Only online reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and caring, but one review strongly criticizes organization, response time, grading speed, and clarity.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is online, with .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

The course appears paper- and reviews.

Format shift

Online reviews mention papers and assignments, while there are .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe an easy class with , but mixed teaching organization and communication.

Main concern

, and unclear instructions may leave students feeling lost.

What students said

“3 papers nothing too outrageous.”
ENG3
“Felt lost mostly...”
ENG3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention papers and assignments but do .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It's an easy class to pass if you stay on top of .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in workload, support, and organization. Credibility rating: Low.

📘 Course Ease

85/100

“Material itself is very easy too.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She will help you with papers and wants her students to succeed.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

50/100

“ and and ends up setting things back.”

Theme 1

📄

  • 3 papers nothing too outrageous.
  • It's an easy class to pass if you stay on top of .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching & Communication

  • She will help you with papers and wants her students to succeed.
  • and to grade, and sometimes just doesn't make any sense and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because only two online reviews exist, they are six years apart, and they give mixed teaching impressions.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG32 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values