AI Rate Professor

Music

Marissa Honda

MUS3 · MUS12 · MUSIC3 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a supportive professor and are willing to participate consistently.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringClear feedbackEasy A with effortOrganized online courseBeginner caution
  • Most students praise Honda as , and .
  • Grades are usually , and effort.
  • Music beginners may find MUS3 harder than expected, even when the professor is supportive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A is very reachable with participation and submitted work, but some courses still require steady effort and reading.

Online reviews strongly support an easy A with effort, while the if students read.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, but music concepts can overwhelm students without prior background.

Online reviews show a mix of easy workload and beginner difficulty, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

65/100

Participation matters in many reviews, but there is .

Online reviews emphasize participation, while the but no detailed attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Students usually recommend her because , and rewards effort.

Online reviews are strongly positive overall, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students mention , and chances to earn points through effort.

Format shift

Online reviews provide strong evidence of , while the in-person-labeled review warns about grade .

Workload

Light

72/100

Most work is manageable, though short-term MUS12 and weekly tasks can feel heavy.

Format shift

Online reviews range from easy to heavy short-term workload, while the .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students repeatedly praise her organization, feedback, responsiveness, personality, and passion for teaching.

Format shift

Online evidence is strongly positive, while the .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention assignments, participation, concert reports, practice work, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online evidence shows assignments plus exams and participation, while the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only in-person-labeled review says the course was easy if students read, but grade updates were unreliable.

Main concern

The gradebook may not reflect the accurate grade during the course.

What students said

“The class was easy as long as you read each section.”
MUS12
“She doesnt update the grade for you until the class is over.”
MUS12

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students mostly describe a and fair grading.

Main concern

Music beginners may feel lost, especially in MUS3.

What students said

“It is def an easy A if you participate and .”
MUS3
“Her classes are always streamlined and she's very communicative so you know exactly what she expects out of you.”
MUS12
“If you aren't familiar with music .”
MUS3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention exams and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, midterm format, or .

Balanced ExamsPossible Pop QuizzesAssignments And Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The test policy.

Online

Online reviews mention exams and pop quizzes, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Balanced ExamsPossible Pop Quizzes
“ and balances content and .”
MUS3
“Beware of pop quizzes”
MUS3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It is def an easy A if you participate and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ and is always there for help.”

📈 Effort And Grades

88/100

“It is def an easy A if you participate and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“Overall amazing professor and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and balances content and .
  • and is very encouraging!
  • Her classes are always streamlined and she's very communicative so you know exactly what she expects out of you.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A
  • The class was easy as long as you read each section.
  • If you aren't familiar with music .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • and is always there for help.
  • .
  • She sees when you put effort in!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across multiple years provide detailed and mostly consistent evidence, though .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MUS37 reviews
MUS124 reviews
MUSIC31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values