AI Rate Professor

Art

Shara Mercado Poole

ART14 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if , and a positive art class experience.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpfulClear expectationsFun classCaringBeginner friendly
  • Both students rated her highly and describe a , and enjoyable art class experience.
  • and helps students plan steps for successful work.
  • Evidence is very positive but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Grades look attainable because she clarifies expectations and helps students understand how to do well.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students describe the class as fun, helpful, and manageable, with .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

In-person , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Both students rated her highly and describe a , and enjoyable learning experience.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students say and she explained how to get a good grade, though there is .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

Reviews describe the course as fun and manageable without complaints about workload.

Format shift

, and neither describes heavy workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students praise her helpfulness, clarity, and practical guidance in art-making.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in-person and consistently positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The , and printmaking work rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention project-based work, with no online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students describe her as , and effective at making art projects easier to approach.

Main concern

The sample is small, so confidence is limited despite strong praise.

What students said

“This class was a lot of fun and I learned about a lot of new ways to make art.”
ART14
“She made sure we knew what the expectations were for finishing out the course and how to get a good grade.”
ART14

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

test policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She made sure we knew what the expectations were for finishing out the course and how to get a good grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and class experience. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“ and made planning out the steps for my printmaking easier.”

📈 Grade Clarity

82/100

“She made sure we knew what the expectations were for finishing out the course and how to get a good grade.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“This class was a lot of fun and I learned about a lot of new ways to make art.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and made planning out the steps for my printmaking easier.
  • She made sure we knew what the expectations were for finishing out the course and how to get a good grade.

Theme 2

🎨 About Class Experience

  • This class was a lot of fun and I learned about a lot of new ways to make art.
  • She made planning out the steps for my printmaking easier.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

The two reviews are recent and detailed enough to be useful, but the small sample limits confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART142 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values