AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Bridget Heyne

PSYCHRN · PSYCHPSYC · RN9 · PSYCH9 · RN6527764 · RN1111 · RN19 · RN65 · RN66 · RN33 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
10%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid if possible, because many students report , and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderDisorganizedUnclear instructionsStressful workloadStrict attendance
  • , and stressful interactions.
  • Grades are often described as harsh or random, even when students follow instructions.
  • A few students say tests follow PowerPoints, but the overall recommendation signal is very negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students earned high grades, but comments , and heavy stress.

Online and in-person comments giving stronger evidence of random or unclear grading.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The content is not always described as impossible, but and disorganization make simple classes feel much harder.

Online reviews emphasize confusion, while and stressful class management.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Several in-person tags and comments say , and there is no evidence of .

Attendance evidence comes almost entirely from in-person reviews, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students overwhelmingly discourage taking her because of , and .

Both formats are negative, but and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough grader and reasons.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tough rubric grading, while and .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is described as busywork, lots of , and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention lots of homework and quick due dates, while and class stress.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most comments describe disorganization, unclear instruction, poor communication, and low learning value.

Format shift

Both formats are negative, with teaching experiences.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and assignments rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes and homework, while , and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with , and stressful class culture.

Main concern

Students often feel they must figure out expectations without useful guidance.

What students said

“Grades are randomly .”
RN66
“ . .”
RN33

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and confusion that interferes with learning.

Main concern

Students report poor communication and stressful expectations.

What students said

“ .”
RN33
“Creates confusion and stress that interferes with focus on learning.”
RN1111

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, pop quizzes, and tests based on PowerPoints, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Quizzes From ModulesPowerPoint-Based TestsPop QuizzesTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention pop quizzes and PowerPoint-based tests, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or .

Pop QuizzesPowerPoint-Based TestsTest Heavy
“She and the .”
RN65
“ , IF YOU KNOW THE MATERIAL IN THE .”
RN9

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes based on modules, YouTube videos, or articles, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Quizzes From Modules
“ modules she provides whether it is Youtube videos or articles.”
RN33

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . . Makes a simple one unit class much more stressful than it needs to be.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“ . .”

⚖️

18/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“Consider not externing if you get her for your RN 19 section.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • . .
  • .
  • Creates confusion and stress that interferes with focus on learning.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Grades are randomly .
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • Class was not fun when it should have been a good learning experience.
  • Students don't spend your money on her class, you wont learn anything and just stress yourself out.
  • Do not waste your time and money for this class in Fresno City College because of this instructor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The judgment is credible because it uses 20 reviews across many years with highly consistent negative themes.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 511

Course coverage

RN95 reviews
RN333 reviews
RN653 reviews
RN11112 reviews
rn192 reviews
Show 5 more courses
PSYCH91 review
PSYCHPSYC1 review
PSYCHRN1 review
RN65277641 review
RN661 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values