AI Rate Professor

History

George Fontes

HIST12 · HIST11 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you can keep up with reading and studying, but do not expect fast online communication.

Best fit · Effort For RewardInteresting lecturesManageable workloadReading heavyMixed communicationWritten exams
  • Students generally earn A grades and describe the work as manageable.
  • Online experiences differ, with one strong review and one complaint about poor responsiveness and .
  • The in-person summer class is faster and but still considered passable with study and participation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

All reported grades are A, and students say the work is doable, though reading and .

Online evidence looks easier overall, while the rewards study.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The class is usually manageable, but reading volume and .

Online reviews describe easier homework, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Only the in-person review clearly warns that participation matters, while online reviews .

In-person evidence suggests attendance and participation matter, while online evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and doable work, but poor online responsiveness lowers confidence.

Online reviews are mixed, while the but based on limited evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

63/100

Students earned A grades, but one online review says he is picky with grading.

Format shift

, while the in-person review says clear preparation can lead to passing.

Workload

Light

76/100

as limited and doable, though students should expect substantial reading.

Format shift

Online workload appears lighter, while the in-person summer class is faster and more study-intensive.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Positive reviews praise lectures and preparation, but one online review reports poor communication.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is split, while the .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

The course uses exams, papers, discussion boards, and a .

Format shift

Online reviews mention papers, discussions, projects, and exams, while the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The written exams and preparation support.

Main concern

The pace and and participation.

What students said

“The class was taken over the summer so it was really fast-paced.”
HIST12
“He makes sure you're prepared to pass so long as you study & participate.”
HIST12

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews say the course can be easy and manageable, but communication may be poor and .

Main concern

Email and .

What students said

“he is terrible to reach out to.”
HIST12
“The only homework is 4 papers (2 pages long, double spaced) and are very interesting to write.”
HIST11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and may include written Blue Book responses, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Lecture-Based ExamsWritten ExamsBlue Book ExamsEssay Portion

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The recognition, fill-in-the-blank, multiple choice, and essay portions, but does not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Written ExamsBlue Book ExamsEssay Portion
“The and consist of photo recognition, fill in the blank with a few multiple choice and an essay portion.”
HIST12

Online

and PowerPoints, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Lecture-Based ExamsPowerPoint-Based Exams
“The and .”
HIST11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Fontes is great! I loved taking his class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Professor Fontes is great! I loved taking his class.”

📚 Workload Balance

76/100

“although his class was easy and ”

📝

60/100

“The and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Fontes is great! I loved taking his class.
  • He makes sure you're prepared to pass so long as you study & participate.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • although his class was easy and
  • A and overall a great class.
  • The class was taken over the summer so it was really fast-paced.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • .
  • he is also very picky with how he grades.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is useful but limited because only 3 reviews are available and one format has a single review.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST122 reviews
HIST111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values