AI Rate Professor

Science

Ivana Pavic

PHSYC11 · PHYSC11 · PHYS2 · PHYS11 · PHYS2A · SCI1A · PHYSICS2A · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid Ivana Pavic unless you already know physics or can self-teach through and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard To UnderstandConfusing LecturesHard ExamsKnowledgeable But Poor DeliverySelf-Teaching Needed
  • Most students say Pavic is difficult to understand and .
  • and do not align well with lectures or homework.
  • A minority say she is knowledgeable and helpful if asked, but the dominant experience is negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Grades may be possible, but , and poor lecture support.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Physics becomes harder because , and prior knowledge seems important.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students advise against taking her because they find her hard to understand and hard to learn from.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

and difficult outcomes, though specific grading rules are not well documented.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, and heavy weekend study make the workload feel demanding.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Most reviews say she is knowledgeable but , and ineffective at explaining physics.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

Reviews mention homework, Pearson assignments, practice questions, tests, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and a need to learn independently, with a few positive comments about knowledge.

Main concern

Students struggle to understand lectures and and exams.

What students said

“Her .”
PHYS11
“Stay away from this instructor! Unless you've had physics.”
PHYSICS2A
“Very hard to .”
SCI1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and weak alignment with lectures, but do not prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser policy.

Hard ExamsLecture-Test MismatchPractice Questions On Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and some practice questions matching tests, but do not clearly prove book or .

Hard ExamsLecture-Test MismatchPractice Questions On Tests
“big mismatch in ”
PHYS11
“She gives out practice questions which are the same on the test.”
PHYSC11
“Her english is terrible and !”
PHYSICS2A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Stay away from this instructor! Unless you've had physics.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Very hard to .”

📚 Course Difficulty

25/100

“Stay away from this instructor! Unless you've had physics.”

⚖️

25/100

“Her english is terrible and !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her .
  • well she is very hard to understand.
  • Terrible. She spends the the class time working out a problem(s) on the board.
  • Very hard to .

Theme 2

📈

  • Her english is terrible and !
  • Tests are so hard, I've spent 25hrs on weekends and got a C in class.
  • big mismatch in

Theme 3

❤️ About Mixed Impressions

  • !
  • She KNOWS what she is talking about.
  • Although her language skills leave a lot to be desired, she is a very knowledgeable teacher that has a good grasp of subject taught.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

, but many are old and some duplicate or conflict with a few positive experiences.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 58

Course coverage

PHSYC112 reviews
PHYS112 reviews
PHYSC112 reviews
PHYSICS2A2 reviews
PHYS21 review
Show 2 more courses
PHYS2A1 review
SCI1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values