AI Rate Professor

English

Gregory Ramirez

ENG1A · ENGL251 · ENGLISH1A · ENGLISH125 · ENGLISH3 · ENGENG · ENGLI125 · ENGLISH · ENG125 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a generally fair English class where doing the work and using rewrites can pay off.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpfulEasy classEssay rewritesBoring at timesFair grader
  • , and chances to revise essays.
  • The class is often described as easy in person, but online reviews show heavier workload and stricter participation expectations.
  • Negative reviews focus on boredom, vague instructions, tough grading, or feeling that the class lacks serious English content.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

In-person students often call the class easy, and , but online students report real workload and strict participation.

, while online reviews require much more consistent effort.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The material is usually manageable and often fun, though .

In-person course content is described as easier than online content, which is more intense.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Participation appears important, and an online student reported being dropped for not participating enough.

Online evidence shows strict participation risk, while as part of the class.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend him because , and allows rewrites, despite some complaints about boredom and clarity.

, while online reviews are more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

He can grade essays tough, but , and make grades more recoverable.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tougher grading, while and rewrites.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The class is often easy in person, but online students describe lots of homework and intense reading.

Format shift

Online .

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Students often call him helpful, fair, funny, and clear, but some describe him as boring, vague, or incompetent.

Format shift

In-person teaching is mostly positive, while online teaching is more polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and discussions more than exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

as helpful, fair, easy, and willing to allow rewrites, though some find him boring or vague.

Main concern

Students who need very structured, serious lectures may find the class vague or boring.

What students said

“ ”
ENG1A
“Mr. and very fair.”
ENG125
“Very Boring but really easy but Really boring”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are split between intense but valuable work and strict participation expectations that can hurt students who fall behind.

Main concern

Online students need to keep up with every assignment and participation requirement.

What students said

“His lectures and but ”
ENG1A
“You must do all the home work in order to receive a good grade AND PUT IN THE WORK.”
ENGLISH3
“Out of all the 8 assignments I missed 2, and he dropped me.”
ENGLISH125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment appears writing-focused and student-friendly because rewrites are common, but .

Essay RewritesFinal Is CakeAssignments FocusedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and essay rewrites, but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

Final Is CakeEssay Rewrites
“ ”
ENGLISH1A
“Plus, he lets you do re-write on the papers.”
ENG1A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great teacher. Very helpful,and and turn in your re-written essay for a higher grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Mr. and very fair.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Recovery

78/100

“he gives the option for and resubmitted for a higher grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Awesome teacher. He made english real fun and interesting.
  • Very Boring but really easy but Really boring
  • Mr. Ramirez is a great teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • EASY A!
  • You must do all the home work in order to receive a good grade AND PUT IN THE WORK.
  • He allowed students to do re-writes with .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • His lectures and but
  • There is a lot of work and
  • this is an easy class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

There are 23 reviews with consistent themes, but many are old and some are vague or polarized.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1A13 reviews
ENGLISH1A3 reviews
ENG1251 review
ENGENG1 review
ENGL2511 review
Show 4 more courses
ENGLI1251 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH1251 review
ENGLISH31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values