AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Matthew Jendian

SOC1A · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a , but expect more steady work in person.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and supportiveAmazing lecturesExtra creditManageable online workloadHeavy in-person workload
  • Students overwhelmingly describe Jendian as caring, passionate, and highly supportive.
  • Online reviews describe lighter work, , and strong help for students who communicate.
  • In-person reviews are positive but , and discussion work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Getting an A looks very reachable because students mention , support, and manageable work, though steady participation is still needed.

Online evidence is stronger for an easy A, while and slightly less grade ease.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The material is described as easy to understand and discussion-based, but the .

Online students call the class easy and fun, while and assignments.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Participation matters and class discussion is emphasized, but reviews do not prove a .

Online reviews emphasize weekly participation tasks, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and engaging.

Both formats are positive, with online reviews showing the strongest enthusiasm.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

and , though the grade record is mixed.

Format shift

Online reviews give clearer evidence of , while and effort.

Workload

Moderate

68/100

Online work is described as not too much, but , and discussion tasks.

Format shift

Online workload appears lighter, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students consistently describe him as , and invested in their success.

Format shift

Both formats support excellent teaching, with online reviews emphasizing help and in-person reviews emphasizing passion and feedback.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Reviews mention readings, discussion boards, quizzes, papers, volunteer hours, and a .

Format shift

Online reviews list weekly assignments and a final, while , and a paper.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise his passion and care but , and discussion requirements.

Main concern

The in-person workload can feel high for a 3-credit course.

What students said

“His lectures were good and he seemed like a passionate professor but, for a 3 credit course, he asks a lot..”
SOC1A
“Professor Jendian is super caring.”
SOC1A

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students describe an easy-to-follow, supportive class with and manageable weekly tasks.

Main concern

You still need to keep up with , and volunteer hours.

What students said

“I absolutely loved this class it was amazing, fun, easy to understand and there wasn't a ton of homework”
SOC1A
“So much !”
SOC1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and a final, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or .

Weekly QuizzesReading QuizzesFinal MentionedExam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final paper, but do not clearly prove exam format or .

Reading QuizzesFinal PaperPolicy Unclear
“A normal week consisted of 4 readings, 2 Inquizitive assignments, 2 big discussion posts, and a reading quiz”
SOC1A
“The only hard thing about his class was the ”
SOC1A

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes and a final, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesFinal MentionedPolicy Unclear
“1 discussion, 1 reply, 1-10 question quiz (weekly),15 volunteer hours, 3 small papers, 1 final.”
SOC1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“This teacher really cares about his students and will reach out to you if you need help and will assist you if you need the help too.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Balance

68/100

“A normal week consisted of 4 readings, 2 Inquizitive assignments, 2 big discussion posts, and a reading quiz”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures were good and he seemed like a passionate professor
  • Professor Jendian is super caring.
  • One of the .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • So much !
  • there wasn't a ton of homework
  • for a 3 credit course, he asks a lot..

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • and gives constant reminders.
  • Actually takes the time to learn EVERYONES names.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed reviews across online and one clear workload concern.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SOC1A7 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values