AI Rate Professor

Nutrition

Nola Cannon

FN40 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can manage a and do not need much guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy WorkloadUnclear InstructionsTough GradingExpensive Access CodeTime Consuming
  • Students repeatedly describe FN40 as workload-heavy, with , and exams.
  • Grades can be good for students who keep up, but the A requires steady effort and time management.
  • Many complaints focus on unclear directions, late responses, rude tone, and paid access codes used only briefly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible, but students consistently say it requires keeping up with , and papers.

Online reviews include the clearest easy-A claim, while and less payoff.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The nutrition material itself is not described as extremely hard, but , and exam mismatch make the course feel harder.

Online reviews describe manageable content with poor structure, while and test-review mismatch.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but participation and .

Online evidence centers on required discussions, while attendance rule.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students hesitate or warn against taking her because the workload, clarity, communication, and .

Online reviews are polarized with some A-grade approval, while and teaching impact.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students often call her a , and good grades appear tied to heavy completion rather than generosity.

Format shift

Online and , though online A grades show that persistence can still pay off.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Reviews , and a time-consuming workload.

Format shift

Online reviews are especially consistent about heavy weekly work, while and discussions.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some students call her responsive or a good teacher, but many describe unclear , and unengaging lectures.

Format shift

Online reviews include both praise and strong complaints, while and workload frustration.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

The course uses exams along with , and diet-analysis assignments.

Format shift

Online comments mention five exams plus weekly work, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

materials, and uninspiring lectures, with only limited support for an easier experience.

Main concern

Students dislike the workload, access-code cost, and low lecture impact.

What students said

“The class is super difficult she grades super late.”
FN40
“She gives you so much work to do and .”
FN40
“However, fairly easy class, just an un-impactful teacher.”
FN40

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but mostly warn that the , and sometimes unclear despite possible A grades.

Main concern

Online students often struggle with vague instructions, heavy weekly tasks, and slow communication.

What students said

“ . Loads of work, barley any time to finish.”
FN40
“Class is an easy A if you just do the work and turn it in on time.”
FN40
“The class is very time consuming though.”
FN40

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention multiple exams and quizzes, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or a .

Five ExamsQuizzesFinal ExamReviews May Not Match Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or open-book policy.

Weekly QuizzesTestsTest Review Mismatch
“There is one discussion and and even up to two.”
FN40
“ actual test.”
FN40

Online

Online reviews mention five exams, quizzes, and exams that may not match textbook content, but .

Five ExamsQuizzesFinal ExamExam Content Mismatch
“is a total of 5 exams counting the final.”
FN40
“There was 5 exams total, discussions and .”
FN40
“ ”
FN40

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Class is an easy A if you just do the work and turn it in on time. HOWEVER, a lot of and vague (figure it out on your own).”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course cost. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“ , and a bit rude.”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“Prof. Cannon is a good teacher, .”

⚖️ Effort For Grades

55/100

“Definitely have to work for an A.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Loads of work, barley any time to finish.
  • The class is very time consuming though.
  • There are two papers 100 points each, 3 day diet analysis part 1 and part 2.

Theme 2

🧭 About Clarity And Support

  • , and a bit rude.
  • She does not make the and straight to the point.
  • If to get an answer.

Theme 3

💰 About Course Cost

  • You will need to purchase a pearson code for 89.99 and will only use it twice.
  • She also makes you pay for this access code for a website that cost $90 and you only use it twice.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across several years show consistent , and mixed teaching quality.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

FN4012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1