AI Rate Professor

History

Carlos Perez

HISTORY11 · HISTORY12 · HIST29 · CLS29 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid him unless you are , and limited communication.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPoor CommunicationTough GraderLecture HeavyDisorganized OnlineTest Heavy
  • Most students , and difficult grading.
  • Online reviews are especially negative, , and grade problems.
  • A few in-person students say he knows the material, but even and vague guidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A high grade is possible only with , and tolerance for vague tests and .

Online reviews show grade risk and disorganization, while and tough grading with only occasional success.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The content is made harder , and weak communication.

Both formats are challenging, with online difficulty driven by disorganization and , and tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

One in-person review says frequent absence or lateness can get students dropped, and .

The , while online reviews do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Students mostly do not recommend him because of , and unpleasant interactions.

Both online reviews are strongly negative, and comments about subject knowledge.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Multiple students report tough grading, , and grade changes that hurt them.

Format shift

Online reviews include a D after grade changes, while .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

, and more work than other sections.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide the strongest workload evidence, while and assignments but focus more on disorganization.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most comments criticize communication, organization, clarity, and tone, with only limited praise for subject knowledge and storytelling.

Format shift

Online teaching is described as disorganized and unsupported, while but often .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly mention quizzes, tests, test-heavy tags, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention thrown quizzes, while , and test-heavy grading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with complaints about tough , and hard-to-follow lectures.

Main concern

Expect , and little reminder support.

What students said

“ .”
HIST29
“Just overall wants you to work more than other students, which is unfair.”
HISTORY12
“ about what's on them”
CLS29

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe disorganization, poor communication, weak lecture materials, and .

Main concern

Students may .

What students said

“There was no syllabus, which is very unhelpful”
CLS29
“He rarely grades assignments and .”
CLS29
“Would link YouTube videos as lectures and .”
CLS29

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam environment is risky because students describe difficult or vague tests and quizzes, but reviews .

QuizzesTest HeavyVague Test CoverageMultiple Choice TestsDifficult Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and multiple choice tests, but do not clearly prove closed-book policy.

Test HeavyVague Test CoverageMultiple Choice TestsDifficult Tests
“ about what's on them”
CLS29
“ , and often easy.”
HIST29
“Test heavy”
HIST29

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes but do not clearly prove webcam use, Lockdown Browser, open-book policy, proctoring, midterm format, or .

Quizzes
“ .”
CLS29
“Would link YouTube videos as lectures and .”
CLS29

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Lectures are but and read the book, you should be fine.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

16/100

“ .”

⚖️

18/100

“Got a never expected grade. Professor never warned me of a bad grade.”

Theme 1

📣 About Communication

  • Little to no communication on his part.
  • and wasnt the .
  • He lacks good communication with his students

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Difficulty

  • Just overall wants you to work more than other students, which is unfair.
  • Have to get text books are you will be lost.
  • Lectures are long because its a lot to cover.

Theme 3

📝

  • about what's on them
  • , and often easy.
  • Got a never expected grade. Professor never warned me of a bad grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across multiple years and formats show a consistent pattern of , and low recommendation.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

HIST294 reviews
CLS293 reviews
HISTORY111 review
HISTORY121 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2