AI Rate Professor

History

Stephen Bohigian

HIST101 · HISTORY11 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want an engaging history professor and writing effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging LecturerCaringFair WorkloadWriting FocusedHighly Recommended
  • and in-person formats.
  • The course involves reading, quizzes, discussion work, essays, and .
  • Writing quality matters, but students still report A or A+ outcomes and fair expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

A grades are common, but students must keep up with readings and .

Online reviews emphasize quizzes and papers, while , and major papers.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students find the work manageable, though history reading and writing remain a real part of the course.

Online reviews sound slightly easier, while and weekly reading.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

One online review says lecture availability was required, while other reviews .

Online evidence suggests scheduled lecture attendance may matter, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students consistently recommend him because , and clear.

Both online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

74/100

Students earn high grades, but one online review says papers must be well written for a good score.

Format shift

Online reviews include the clearest grading caution, while .

Workload

Moderate

68/100

The workload includes , and a final paper, but students say it is manageable.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes and papers, while and written assignments.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students describe him as engaging, caring, compassionate, knowledgeable, and memorable.

Format shift

In-person reviews emphasize live engagement, while online reviews still describe him as fair and great.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment , and papers rather than many exams.

Format shift

Both formats show assignment-heavy assessment, with online and final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students praise his engagement, compassion, and , and papers.

Main concern

The subject matter can be heavy and the and writing.

What students said

“Knew how to keep a class engaged even when the subject matter was heavy.”
HISTORY11
“ every week, a and final paper”
HIST101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students describe a fair course with , and some lecture availability requirements.

Main concern

Students need to keep up with reading and .

What students said

“ and doing small quizzes at the end of it that were pretty easy.”
HISTORY11
“you have to be available for his lectures, 3 days a week”
HISTORY11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course uses quizzes and , but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Midterm EssayFinal PaperSmall QuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final paper, but do not clearly prove exam rules or .

Midterm EssayFinal PaperNo Clear Exam Policy Evidence
“a and ”
HIST101

Online

Online reviews mention small quizzes, two papers, a midterm, and a final, but .

Small QuizzesTwo PapersMidterm And FinalNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ pretty easy”
HISTORY11
“2 papers a midterm and a ”
HISTORY11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I can safely say .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Knew how to keep a class engaged even when the subject matter was heavy.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“ !”

📈 Workload Balance

68/100

“ but wasn't too bad!! overall a great professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great all-around person firstly.
  • He was very compassionate during this COVID-19 pandemic.
  • overall a great professor.

Theme 2

📝

  • and doing small quizzes at the end of it that were pretty easy.
  • There was only 2 written papers but it has to be pretty well written to get a good score.
  • every week, a and final paper

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Four detailed and consistent reviews across online and , but the sample is still small.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HISTORY113 reviews
HIST1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values