AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Greg Jamison

MATH5A · CSCI40 · MATH4A · MATH103 · MATH4B · MATH102 · MATH5B · MATH26 · MATH7 · CSCI41 · 75 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
15.15%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

unless you already know the subject and can teach yourself through a heavy, strict course.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-teaching requiredTough graderHeavy homeworkFast and unclear lecturesNot beginner friendly
  • Most students say he knows the material but .
  • The workload and .
  • A few strong students , but beginners struggle badly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible through curves, resubmissions, or prior skill, but most comments , and high failure risk.

Both formats are hard, but and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The material is intellectually demanding and often made harder .

In-person evidence is broad and consistent, while online evidence also points to self-teaching from sparse materials.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

Attendance is often important because students mention quizzes, notes, and needing class or office hours to keep up, though .

; online reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students warn against taking him because they feel unsupported, overworked, and unable to learn from lectures.

Both online and in-person comments are negative, with rare in-person praise from prepared or advanced students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

Students frequently call him a , though some mention curves, partial credit, resubmissions, or .

Format shift

and occasional grade rescue mechanisms; online reviews mainly describe tough or .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and outside self-study.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work, with online .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

He is often described as knowledgeable and sometimes helpful, but most students say .

Format shift

, while online reviews are almost entirely negative about support and organization.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Comments mention , and group work, so assessment is mixed rather than purely exam-based.

Format shift

and projects more often; online reviews mention assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews mostly describe hard classes with , and occasional help for already prepared students.

Main concern

because lectures are brief, fast, or ineffective.

What students said

“His lectures don't have much substance, so self-teaching is a must.”
CSCI40
“He goes through the material way too fast and talks to the class as if we are mathematicians.”
MATH4B

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative and describe self-teaching, poor organization, delayed grades, and use of his own website instead of Canvas.

Main concern

Students felt ignored and unsupported in a .

What students said

“you basically teach yourself”
MATH103
“It feels like he's setting us up to fail.”
MATH26

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

quizzes, and few major graded items, while online exam rules are not clearly proven.

Written Closed-Book TestsTough TestsPop QuizzesFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, written closed-book tests, and few graded items.

Written Closed-Book TestsTough TestsPop QuizzesFew Graded Items
“All 3 tests are written and closed-book.”
CSCI40
“The ”
MATH26

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His lectures don't have much substance, so self-teaching is a must.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation patterns. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“He has a hard time conveying that knowledge to the class.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“He gives WAY to much hw and doesn't give enough credit for them.”

⚖️

26/100

“He will tell you in person that your program works and then when he grades it he will find any .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You will basically have to teach yourself the material.
  • His lectures are not thorough.
  • He goes through the material way too fast.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • hardest course taken and was only 3 units.
  • grades.

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendations

  • unless you like suffering.
  • .
  • as a last resort.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

75

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across many years , and heavy work.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 516
3 out of 512
2 out of 511
1 out of 524

Course coverage

CSCI4017 reviews
MATH4B8 reviews
MATH267 reviews
CSCI414 reviews
MATH5B4 reviews
Show 6 more courses
MATH5A3 reviews
MATH1032 reviews
MATH4A2 reviews
261 review
MATH1021 review
MATH71 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 7

B range

3

B 1 · B- 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 2

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 3 · Not sure yet 5