AI Rate Professor

Foreign Languages

Cindy Hodges

ASL5 · ASL1 · ASL123 · ASL3 · ASL · ASL1AND2 · ASL7 · ASL2 · ASL234 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

She is a strong choice for ASL students who will show up, participate, and practice consistently.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyFunny and caringBeginner friendlyParticipation mattersEasy ASL learningHelpful signing feedback
  • Most students describe her as funny, patient, helpful, and easy to learn from.
  • In-person ASL classes are usually considered manageable if students attend and participate.
  • Online reviews are more mixed, with , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Most in-person students describe easy work and manageable quizzes if they attend, though and .

In-person evidence strongly , while online evidence is mixed and and grading complaints.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Students repeatedly say she makes ASL understandable and fun, though signing immersion and fast pacing can challenge some learners.

In-person reviews call the class easy and engaging, while online reviews and quiz preparation.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

as harshly enforced, but many students say showing up is essential and missed classes can hurt participation.

In-person reviews clearly stress attendance for learning and grades, while online and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

because , and effective at teaching ASL.

, while online reviews are only moderately positive and more workload-sensitive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Many students call the class easy and mention makeups or low homework, but online reviews report no and .

Format shift

and participation-based, while online grading is less lenient in the limited reviews.

Workload

Light

78/100

Most , though online ASL 7 and ASL 4/7 reviews mention lots of homework.

Format shift

In-person workload is usually light, while online workload appears heavier and more variable.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students overwhelmingly describe her as funny, patient, helpful, caring, and effective at teaching signing.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is very strong, while online evidence is mixed but .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention quizzes, midterm and , and participation rather than one dominant method.

Format shift

In-person reviews describe quizzes, finals, signing demonstrations, and participation, while and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews overwhelmingly praise her humor, patience, signing immersion, and beginner-friendly teaching.

Main concern

Attendance and participation matter because signing practice happens in class.

What students said

“Her class is easy to understand as she can be very expressive when it comes to signing.”
ASL1
“Show up to class, that is the only way you will learn and you .”
ASL1
“She goes out of her way to help you when you need it”
ASL2

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, with one harsh complaint and and .

Main concern

Online students may face more homework, faster pacing, and .

What students said

“ and mistakes.”
ASL2
“She gives a lot of homework and ”
ASL7
“ ”
ASL234

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence suggests normal ASL quizzes and signing-based assessments, with .

QuizzesMidterm and FinalSigning Conversation ExamOnline Tests Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a signing conversation exam, but do not clearly prove closed-book or proctoring rules.

Midterm and FinalSigning Conversation ExamQuizzes
“the has two test (mid term and , and .”
ASL1
“one of the /someone she pairs you with.”
ASL2

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or Lockdown Browser rules.

QuizzesExam policy not clearly proven
“Not very detailed on what is going to be on quiz wish she would provide study guide”
ASL234

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She goes out of her way to help you when you need it, and she makes learning sign language very easy and very enjoyable.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, ASL practice, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“She goes out of her way to help you when you need it, and she makes learning sign language very easy and very enjoyable.”

👍 Recommendation Level

88/100

“I highly reccomend her.”

📈 Ease and Grades

82/100

“Great class, easy A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and thorough.
  • She makes sure the class knows what they are learning and can tell if one is lost.
  • She is a .

Theme 2

🧏 About ASL Practice

  • It forces you to practice what you're learning.
  • Show up to class, that is the only way you will learn and you .
  • Wonderful teacher, very funnny, and helps you sign.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload and Grades

  • Great class, easy A.
  • She doesn't give out homework often, just an .
  • She gives a lot of homework and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 27 reviews across many years, with and limited but useful online contrast.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ASL17 reviews
ASL26 reviews
ASL2343 reviews
ASL53 reviews
ASL2 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ASL32 reviews
ASL72 reviews
ASL1231 review
ASL1AND21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1