AI Rate Professor

Anatomy

Rachel Tamayo

BIO20 · BIOL67A · BIO21B · BIO22 · BIO3 · BIOL3 · BIO5 · BIOL16 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

Avoid this professor unless , and tolerate difficult exams with limited support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf Teaching RequiredTest HeavyTough GraderPoor CommunicationHeavy Workload
  • Most students describe the class as , and poorly supported.
  • Many reviews say lectures do not match exams or require students to teach themselves.
  • A small minority found success by studying heavily, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and heavy studying even when one positive review says hard work can pay off.

Online reviews are especially harsh about quizzes and exams, while and poor alignment with lectures.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The material and course experience are repeatedly described as extremely hard, fast, and test heavy, even when one student says the work itself is not impossible.

Both formats describe high difficulty, but online reviews emphasize the professor making the class harder than the material.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

One review warns that skipping class means you will not pass, and the flipped format expects students to prepare outside class and participate in class.

Online evidence includes a strict attendance tag, while discussion.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Most students strongly advise against taking her because they felt unsupported, overtested, and .

Both formats are mostly negative, with online reviews showing the strongest and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Multiple reviews tag and withdrawals, and describe limited or unequal .

Format shift

Online reviews provide the strongest harsh-grading evidence, while and no .

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Students report lecture-heavy classes, lots of homework, so many papers, weekly quizzes, and long required studying.

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly mention weekly quizzes and heavy work, while , and papers.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Most comments describe poor communication, rude treatment, unclear lectures, self-teaching, and .

Format shift

Online reviews focus on rude emails and poor support, while and stressful classroom treatment.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

The course is repeatedly described as , and exam content that students say does not match lectures.

Format shift

Both online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews also lean negative, with , and some reports of belittling students.

Main concern

The main concern is fast-paced teaching that does not prepare students well for exams.

What students said

“She refuses to teach.”
BIOL67A
“The lectures did not match the exams and was extremely difficult to study for.”
BIO20
“ .”
BIO22

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative, citing poor , and frequent self-teaching.

Main concern

The main concern is that students feel unsupported while .

What students said

“Managed to pass the class, but basically taught myself.”
BIO20
“ . and weekly quizzes.”
BIOL16
“She is so concerned with cheating that she will cut your test taking time to 20 second per question”
BIOL16

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and stressful testing, , and very tight online quiz timing, but reviews do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Hard ExamsWeekly QuizzesTimed Online QuizzesTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and , but do not clearly prove closed-book policy, proctoring, midterm format, or final format.

Hard TestsTest HeavyLecture-Test Mismatch
“The lectures did not match the exams and was extremely difficult to study for.”
BIO20
“ .”
BIO22

Online

Online reviews , and very tight test timing, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Fill-In-The-Blank QuizzesWeekly QuizzesHard ExamsVery Tight Timing
“ , so spelling matters more than it should.”
BIOL16
“ . and weekly quizzes.”
BIOL16
“20 second per question”
BIOL16

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Managed to pass the class, but basically taught myself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Managed to pass the class, but basically taught myself.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

12/100

“ .”

🧪

20/100

“ . and weekly quizzes.”

📚 Workload Load

15/100

“Aweful, communication. Abseoutly the hardest class I have ever taken, simply due to the professor and not the material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She refuses to teach.
  • Managed to pass the class, but basically taught myself.
  • Lectures were often posted late, and she didnt seem to care about any student concerns.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • !!! EXTREMELY HARD AND TEST HEAVY.
  • and weekly quizzes.
  • No , only when you went to etc.

Theme 3

❤️ About Communication

  • She came across very rude over
  • She has been super cold and unempathetic to her entire class.
  • If you asked for assistance she would say "look at your notes".

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 16 reviews across several years and both formats show a highly consistent negative pattern, despite a few positive outliers.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 513

Course coverage

BIOL166 reviews
BIO203 reviews
BIOL67A2 reviews
BIO21B1 review
BIO221 review
Show 3 more courses
BIO31 review
BIO51 review
BIOL31 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 2