AI Rate Professor

English

Marcia Muldoon

ENGLISH15 · ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENG15C · ENGLISH2515C · ENGLISH1A · ENGLISH125 · ENG1B · ENG15 · ENGLISH · ENG125 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want a strong English teacher who pushes writing and critical thinking rather than a low-effort A.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerInspiring TeacherClear CriteriaChallenging WritingInteresting ReadingsHigh Standards
  • Students overwhelmingly praise her as inspiring, memorable, and effective for English and writing courses.
  • The course can require planning and time, so it is not always an easy A.
  • Her standards can feel tough early, but many students say they learned a lot.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is possible, but comments say , and real effort rather than being automatic.

and says the class is not always an easy A, while the single online review does not address grades clearly.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course is intellectually engaging and sometimes challenging, , and critical thinking.

and accessibility, while the lone online review supports critical thinking but gives limited difficulty detail.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an , though several comments suggest deadlines and participation matter.

, so flexibility remains uncertain.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students strongly recommend her because she is inspiring, interesting, and helps students improve their writing and thinking.

, while the single online review is also positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

and fair but not especially easy, with high standards and timely completion expected.

Format shift

, while the online review does not clearly address grading.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Some assignments are called reasonable, but a recent review says the class takes a lot of time and planning.

Format shift

, while online workload evidence is minimal.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students repeatedly describe her as , and unusually effective at teaching writing and literature.

Format shift

In-person evidence is extensive and very positive, while the single online review also supports strong teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

The comments , and discussions rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point toward writing and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are strongly positive, describing her as , and demanding in ways that help students learn.

Main concern

The main concern is that the and feel tough, especially for students who want minimal effort.

What students said

“However, this class is not an easy A.”
ENG1B
“Professor Muldoon made me want to stay in college.”
ENGLISH
“She taught me more than any teacher!!”
ENGLISH125

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The online review is positive and and critical thinking in essay writing.

Main concern

There is too little online evidence to judge workload, grading, or .

What students said

“She really encouraged good class discussions and critical .”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essays, writing projects, readings, and discussions, but they do not clearly prove exam .

EssaysWriting ProjectsDiscussions

Assessment risk

Varies

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and projects, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, midterms, or finals.

Writing AssignmentsCreative ProjectsReadings
“ .”
ENG15
“She had us read great stuff, and gave .”
ENGLISH15

Online

The online review mentions essays, discussion, and critical thinking but does not clearly prove exam .

EssaysClass Discussions
“She really encouraged good class discussions and critical .”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Muldoon made me want to stay in college.She explained literature to me and she taught me how to write well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“Professor Muldoon made me want to stay in college.She explained literature to me and she taught me how to write well.”

👍 Recommendation Level

92/100

“I took two classes from her because I liked her so much.”

📈 Grade Effort

62/100

“However, this class is not an easy A.”

📝 Assignment Focus

22/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a great and inspiring teacher.
  • This teacher is a GREAT PROFESSOR! She makes the class interesting.
  • She taught me more than any teacher!!

Theme 2

📚 About Writing & Learning

  • She explained literature to me and she taught me how to write well.
  • Her advice was practical, easy to follow.
  • She really encouraged good class discussions and critical .

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • However, this class is not an easy A.
  • I got an A and it wasn't hard. All you have to
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 14 reviews over many years show a consistent positive teaching pattern, though many older reviews are less detailed.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGLISH2 reviews
ENGLISH1252 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
ENG1251 review
ENG151 review
Show 6 more courses
ENG15C1 review
ENG1A1 review
ENG1B1 review
ENGL1A1 review
ENGLISH151 review
ENGLISH2515C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values