AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Technology

Dan Sands

IS15 · CIT15 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Consider him only if you can manage a high-volume online class independently and stay ahead of deadlines.

Best fit · Self Taught ProOnline Only EvidenceLots of HomeworkPolarized ReviewsStrict DeadlinesClear Criteria
  • The two reviews are completely split, with one student calling the class easy and another calling it tedious and unforgiving.
  • chapter-based work.
  • The course may be manageable with time and organization, but late-work and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

One student earned an A+ and found it easy, but another got a C and described the work and exams as unforgiving.

All evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The material can feel easy, but the , and Cengage issues add friction.

Only online evidence exists, and it conflicts between easy content and tedious execution.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Attendance is not clearly discussed, but online deadlines and .

All format evidence is online, and there is .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation depends heavily on whether the , and lots of online work.

Only online reviews exist, and they are evenly split between strong approval and strong rejection.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

One and no late work, while the other says grade improvement is allowed.

Format shift

and directly conflicting.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Both reviews mention many assignments or rating alone suggests.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from online reviews, with no in-person comparison.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching quality is uncertain because one student strongly praises him and one strongly criticizes the course setup.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, so the teaching score reflects polarized online experiences.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

The course , and software exams rather than a single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention , and program exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online evidence is sharply mixed, with one review praising time and grade improvement while and .

Main concern

A small sample shows , and deadline rigidity.

What students said

“A huge amount of .”
IS15
“he provides enough time for all and allows to improve grades”
CIT15

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews mention Cengage and program exams but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Cengage ExamsProgram ExamsQuizzesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

, and program exams, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Cengage ExamsQuizzesProgram Exams
“ .”
IS15
“13 chaperts 13 quizes 13 discussion”
CIT15
“each program has an exam”
CIT15

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . They mark you wrong for any little mistake.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the split between workload complaints and a positive easy-course experience. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️ Polarized Experience

50/100

“would retake 100%”

📚 Heavy Workload

25/100

“A huge amount of .”

🧪

45/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • A huge amount of .
  • 13 chaperts 13 quizes 13 discussion

Theme 2

⚖️

  • will be received.
  • he provides enough time for all and allows to improve grades

Theme 3

💻 About Online Course Experience

  • This class if fairly easy
  • It is was too much for such a low credit class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 online reviews are available, and they give opposite experiences, so confidence is limited.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CIT151 review
IS151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values