AI Rate Professor

Anatomy

Susan Leod

BIO20 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

if you want a challenging anatomy class and can tolerate a demanding or inconsistent teaching experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHigh DifficultyRude ToneLecture HeavyLots of Homework
  • but says it is not an easy grade.
  • and classroom tone.
  • ease.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Both students earned B grades, and the comments directly warn that this is not an easy grade.

Online evidence frames the hard grade as part of serious learning, while and participation pressure.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Anatomy and physiology are presented as demanding, with high difficulty ratings and lecture-heavy work.

Online evidence stresses serious subject mastery, while , and workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters is mentioned, but .

In-person evidence mentions participation, while online evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation depends on whether the student values rigorous learning enough to accept the difficulty and reported classroom issues.

Online evidence is positive and recommends her for learners, while her again.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Both reviews show B outcomes and one explicitly tags her as a .

Format shift

Online evidence explicitly says tough grader, while and tone.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The , and labs, while online difficulty is also very high.

Format shift

The heavy workload evidence is clearer in person than online.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

The online review praises serious learning, but the and humiliating behavior.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is strongly positive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

The comments , and participation, but do not prove an exam-heavy structure.

Format shift

, and participation, while online evidence mainly mentions grading difficulty.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person review reports rude treatment, mean comments, and a poor classroom experience.

Main concern

The main concern is disrespectful classroom communication.

What students said

“She's pretty rude, she expect you to be perfect in English and will make you sound really dumb if you write or said something wrong or would even make fun of you.”
BIO20
“She also love to make mean comments during lectures and labs too.”
BIO20

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The online review is positive for serious learning but warns that the class is not for easy-grade seekers.

Main concern

The course is very difficult and not an easy grade.

What students said

“She is awesome if you really want to learn anatomy and physiology this is it for you but if you're looking for an easy grade.”
BIO20

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, open-book policy, midterm, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book policy, midterm, or final requirements.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, open-book policy, midterm, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is awesome if you really want to learn anatomy and physiology this is it for you but if you're looking for an easy grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She's pretty rude, she expect you to be perfect in English and will make you sound really dumb if you write or said something wrong or would even make fun of you.”

📈 Difficulty & Grades

28/100

“She is awesome if you really want to learn anatomy and physiology this is it for you but if you're looking for an easy grade.”

⚖️

25/100

“She is awesome if you really want to learn anatomy and physiology this is it for you but if you're looking for an easy grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is awesome if you really want to learn anatomy and physiology this is it for you but if you're looking for an easy grade.
  • She's pretty rude, she expect you to be perfect in English and will make you sound really dumb if you write or said something wrong or would even make fun of you.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Class Tone

  • She also love to make mean comments during lectures and labs too.
  • I only took her class because she was the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only two reviews, and the online and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BIO202 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values