AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Stephanie Smith

CD3 · CD37A · CD39 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want a supportive but moderately demanding instructor, but be cautious with online sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring in personClear but demandingQuiz heavyStrict online grading
  • , clarity, and care.
  • The online review is strongly negative and describes strict quizzes and low trust.
  • , and a presentation, so the class is not effortless.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A seems possible with effort, but quizzes, essays, and .

Online evidence suggests harsher grading, while grade.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The material is manageable but , and challenge to feel standard rather than easy.

In-person comments call the challenge appropriate, while the online .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Participation matters appears in reviews, but comments do not clearly prove a .

Online and in-person reviews mention participation or class engagement, but neither gives a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and caring teaching, but the online experience lowers confidence.

In-person students are strongly positive, while the single .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

In-person grading seems fair, but the .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students mention many quizzes, essays, reading, and a presentation, but not an overwhelming workload.

Format shift

; the online review mainly mentions quizzes.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

In-person students praise her clarity, care, and support, but the online review describes an unprofessional experience.

Format shift

Teaching quality looks strong in person and weak online.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to mix quizzes, essays, participation, and a .

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes quizzes, while , and a presentation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students describe her as , and generally worth taking despite steady work.

Main concern

Some nights drag because of quizzes, essays, and reading.

What students said

“She was very clear, the coursework was the right amount of challenging and you can tell she loves teaching.”
CD3
“Lots of quizzes, lots of 2-3 page essays, make sure you get the text book.”
CD39

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review reports distrustful treatment, strict quizzes, and .

Main concern

Online quizzes and .

What students said

“You cannot go back when in a , if one word is wrong you are marked down.”
CD37A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but online quizzes sound strict and the .

Quiz HeavyNo Backtracking on Online QuizGroup Presentation Final

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a , but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, midterm, or final exam rules.

Lots of QuizzesGroup Presentation Final
“Lots of quizzes, lots of 2-3 page essays, make sure you get the text book.”
CD39
“Group presentation was the .”
CD39

Online

The online review says quizzes did not allow going back to check answers, but reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

No Backtracking on Online QuizStrict Quiz Grading
“You cannot go back when in a , if one word is wrong you are marked down.”
CD37A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was very clear, the coursework was the right amount of challenging and you can tell she loves teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She was very clear, the coursework was the right amount of challenging and you can tell she loves teaching.”

⚖️

45/100

“You cannot go back when in a , if one word is wrong you are marked down.”

📚 Workload

45/100

“Lots of quizzes, lots of 2-3 page essays, make sure you get the text book.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Instructor Smith is an influential educator who elicit respect to her students while generating a safe environment inside and outside the classroom setting.
  • She was very clear, the coursework was the right amount of challenging and you can tell she loves teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of quizzes, lots of 2-3 page essays, make sure you get the text book.
  • Easy B if you dont try so hard on the quizzes!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Concerns

  • She does not trust the students and it shows, she is unprofessional and not understanding.
  • Only professor I have had like this. Its sad.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews are available, but and specific details.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CD392 reviews
CD31 review
CD37A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1