AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Technology

Daniel Owens

CIT28 · CIT50 · CIT15 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid his online CIT15 unless you can teach yourself, but his in-person hands-on CIT50 may work for motivated students.

Best fit · Self Taught ProOnline DisorganizationBoring LecturesHands-On LabsStrict AttendanceAccess Code Required
  • Online reviews are strongly negative and , and little teaching.
  • In-person CIT50 reviews are much stronger because students liked the hands-on server work and support.
  • Attendance and access-code costs are concerns, especially in CIT15.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some students earned A , but online confusion can make the effort much higher.

Online reviews make the A feel harder due to unclear assignments, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The content itself sounds manageable, but poor organization and .

Online reviews report confusing course management, while and stronger hands-on learning.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and participation matters.

Attendance issues are supported by in-person reviews, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendations depend heavily on format and course, with CIT50 praised but online CIT15 strongly criticized.

, while in-person CIT50 reviews are positive and CIT28 is very negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades can be earned through homework and , but reviews .

Format shift

In-person reviews mention easy homework and , while online reviews focus on .

Workload

Moderate

57/100

, but online setup problems and .

Format shift

Online workload feels heavier due to confusion, while in-person workload is lighter in CIT15 and exam-focused in CIT50.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with serious online complaints and .

Format shift

Online teaching is rated poorly, while in-person CIT50 shows better support and practical learning.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Reviews emphasize tests, exams, practice tests, and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention test-heavy work, while in-person CIT50 centers on exams and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with strong CIT50 praise for hands-on work but criticism of boring, off-topic lectures.

Main concern

Lectures can be rambling, and .

What students said

“this is one of the .”
CIT50
“ .”
CIT15
“He goes ranting on about some stupid story no one asked for every day.”
CIT28

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly negative, citing confusing assignment setup, wrong materials, and weak instruction.

Main concern

Students say the and requires self-teaching.

What students said

“He teaches nothing.”
CIT15
“He totally got everything wrong from day one.”
CIT15

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and a final, but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Test HeavyPractice Test for FinalTextbook-Based Homework

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and practice tests, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Practice Test for FinalExam-Based Homework
“The to study the practice test for the final.”
CIT50

Online

Online reviews say tests were harder than the simplified materials, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Test Heavy
“The info is all very simplified and basic compared to the .”
CIT15

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He teaches nothing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting format differences in online organization and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“He teaches nothing.”

👍 Recommendation Split

45/100

“this is one of the .”

📌 Format Risk

35/100

“He totally got everything wrong from day one.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Experience

  • He uses Mylabit the .
  • He totally got everything wrong from day one.
  • Needs to retire.

Theme 2

🏫

  • Owens is willling to help you out if you are giving it your all.
  • Lectures are boring but only lasts for half the class and the rest is time for hw.
  • He goes ranting on about some stupid story no one asked for every day.

Theme 3

📈

  • , can use the textbook and can easily get ahead.
  • The to study the practice test for the final.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 6 reviews are available, but they include detailed and consistent format-specific concerns.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CIT153 reviews
CIT502 reviews
CIT281 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1