AI Rate Professor

English

Zay Guffy-Bill

ENGLISH125 · ENG125 · ENG1A · ENGLISH125W · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Only take her if you can tolerate disorganization and , and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyDisorganizedCaring at TimesTough Grader RiskAttendance MattersInconsistent Workload
  • Recent online ENG1A reviews are very negative because students say she disappeared and .
  • and easy to harsh complaints about grading, absences, and organization.
  • Course difficulty is inconsistent because some sections feel easy while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

Some students say the class is easy to pass, but tough grading, missing assignments, and .

Online reviews make grades feel risky because assignments were missing, while in-person reviews range from .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The course content is often described as easy or passable, but writing workload and disorganization can raise the difficulty.

Online content was not necessarily hard but was poorly managed, while papers and readings.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Multiple reviews say participation or and warn students not to show up late or skip.

and in-person warnings, with clearer support from in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

The strong recent complaints about ghosting, lost work, and poor organization outweigh the older positive comments.

, while in-person reviews are highly mixed with both strong praise and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Some sections are easy to pass, but comments about tough grading, lost work, and .

Format shift

, while in-person reviews include both easy passing and tough grading.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

Workload varies from , and community service requirements.

Format shift

Online workload became concentrated into a late final paper, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

She is sometimes praised as caring and patient, but organization and communication problems are too frequent to ignore.

Format shift

Online teaching is especially weak due to ghosting, while and chaotic.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Reviews , and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Both online and and papers as the main assessment method.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are polarized, with some praising her kindness and easy workload while , and poor organization.

Main concern

The main risk is inconsistency in , and required work.

What students said

“Tough grader, want a good grade write a 10-page university paper.”
ENG1A
“She's very sweet!”
ENG125
“Very easy going teacher, super nice but ”
ENG125

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe severe organization and communication problems, including missing assignments and a .

Main concern

Students report that she disappeared for weeks and .

What students said

“ghosted us for a month”
ENG1A
“ .”
ENG1A
“Otherwise she provided .”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly describe papers and reading work, and they do not clearly prove traditional exam rules, proctoring, webcam, or open-book policies.

Final PaperMultiple EssaysReading Assignments

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and reading assignments, but they do not clearly prove exam format or .

Four PapersReading Homework
“4 papers total for this class.”
ENG1A
“a lot of reading homework from 2 different text books.”
ENG1A

Online

Online reviews describe a high-stakes final paper, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Final PaperHigh-Stakes Essay
“presented us with ”
ENG1A
“For the 12 page essay”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very easy going teacher, super nice but as well as another assignment and I received a 0 on both assignments”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Very easy going teacher, super nice but ”

⚠️ Online Reliability

25/100

“ghosted us for a month”

📄

35/100

“Tough grader, want a good grade write a 10-page university paper.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's very sweet!
  • and cares about all her students...
  • Very easy going teacher, super nice but

Theme 2

📄

  • 4 papers total for this class.
  • For the 12 page essay
  • goos teacher, lots of work, if you do it, you will do well.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • ghosted us for a month
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

There are 18 reviews, but many are old or vague, and opinions are sharply inconsistent across years and formats.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG1A7 reviews
ENGLISH1256 reviews
ENG1254 reviews
ENGLISH125W1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values