AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Sylvie Huneault-Schultze

ESL1791 · ESLR265 · ESL · ESL264W · EMLS168 · ESL265R · ESL68 · EMLS168R · ESLALL · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want a structured ESL class that rewards steady work and participation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but strictStrong feedbackGroup work heavyReal learning focusParticipation matters
  • Most students praise her as caring, structured, and effective for learning English.
  • The course is not effortless, with reading, participation, rules, and group work expected.
  • Grades appear fair when students attend, participate, and complete the work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Getting an A is realistic if you attend, participate, and do the work, but it is not a free grade.

In-person evidence supports fair effort for reward, while the one and no makeups.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The class is structured and helpful, but students , and real effort.

In-person reviews describe a useful but not easy course, while the online and classroom behavior than content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Attendance and participation matter because students say she expects them to show up and engage.

and participation, while the online review says missed work has no makeups.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

because , and helps students learn English.

, but the single online review is negative and lowers confidence for online classes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

because students must complete work, participate, and handle strict rules.

Format shift

In-person reviews suggest fair grading for effort, while the online review calls her a .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and participation, but most students do not describe it as overwhelming.

Format shift

and group activities, while the online review highlights homework and missed-work penalties.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most comments describe her as caring, structured, detailed, and genuinely effective at teaching English.

Format shift

, while the single online review reports rude discussion behavior.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Comments mention , and class discussions, so assessment appears mixed.

Format shift

In-person reviews mention group work, participation, and open-book tests; the , and discussions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and describe a caring, structured teacher who makes students work and participate.

Main concern

Students who dislike rules, attendance, or group work may struggle.

What students said

“She is strict, but she is really interested to help her students and she really wants her students succeed!!!”
ESL68
“Do the work and you will pass.”
EMLS168
“Her class is not so easy but you will learn a lot.”
ESL1791

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review , and rude discussion behavior.

Main concern

and no makeups make the online evidence risky.

What students said

“She is a if shes needed.”
EMLS168R
“She doesnt give makeups on ”
EMLS168R

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, but and no review proves strict proctoring.

Open Book TestsClass DiscussionsBluebooksNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but comments do not clearly prove midterm, final, or proctoring rules.

Open Book TestsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“she does allot of .”
ESL68

Online

The online review mentions bluebooks and class discussions but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

BluebooksClass DiscussionsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“She doesnt give makeups on ”
EMLS168R

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have a desire to really learn English and you are ready to work a lot, then her class is for you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She is simply... AMAZING!!! The .”

📈 Effort For Reward

68/100

“Do the work and you will pass.”

⚖️

58/100

“She is a if shes needed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her classes are well structured, she goes into details and if you dont understand something.
  • Great professor! Listens to you talk.
  • Rules, Rules, Rules that?s how she teaches her classes, but .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Difficulty

  • Her class is not so easy but you will learn a lot.
  • Although her course is hard, it is a great help for us.
  • All you have to do is go to class pay attention and do the work

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Support

  • She truly care about students.
  • she is really interested to help her students and she really wants her students succeed!!!
  • Open to help students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews across many years give consistent evidence of , and participation-heavy classes.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ESL265R3 reviews
ESL683 reviews
ESLR2652 reviews
EMLS1681 review
EMLS168R1 review
Show 4 more courses
ESL1 review
ESL17911 review
ESL264W1 review
ESLALL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values