AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Debby Dailey

RN32A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid her unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear gradingWeekly assignmentsPoor feedbackRandom grades
  • The only review describes weekly work and .
  • as random and harsh.
  • The .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even strong effort may not translate into an A because the and .

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content itself is not described as especially hard, but the assignments and .

All because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

All because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

The student does not recommend her because , and grades seem random.

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

The review says she can randomly give low grades despite effort and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The review reports something due every week.

Format shift

All workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

The review criticizes and suggests poor engagement with student papers.

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The review focuses on weekly submissions and papers rather than exams.

Format shift

All assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review is , and feedback.

Main concern

Grades feel random and .

What students said

“she assigns something to turn in every week.”
RN32A
“ ”
RN32A
“Grade you get at the end is completely random.”
RN32A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, midterm, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Grade you get at the end is completely random.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

12/100

“ and she'll randomly give you a C.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“she assigns something to turn in every week.”

👎 Recommendation Risk

12/100

“ ”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • and she'll randomly give you a C.
  • Grade you get at the end is completely random.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • she assigns something to turn in every week.
  • You're lucky if .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because the analysis relies on only one review, though that review is detailed and internally consistent.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

RN32A1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values