AI Rate Professor

English

Katlyn Tjerrild

ENG1A · ENGL01A · ENGLISH1A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Take Tjerrild if you want rigorous writing practice and , but if you need an easy or beginner-friendly English class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy writingDetailed feedbackLots of readingHelpful lectures
  • and helpful lectures, especially for students who use that .
  • The class is writing-heavy with lots of , and no mentioned.
  • Online reviews are more intense than the single and workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but students must manage heavy writing, lots of , and no .

Online reviews show the hardest path to an A, while the but more forgiving.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course is intellectually demanding because it is reading- and writing-heavy with rigorous essay expectations.

Online reviews are clearly challenging, while the but .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an , though one in-person student says she allowed extra catch-up time.

Online , and the in-person review only supports deadline flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

, but not for students seeking an easy or beginner-friendly class.

Online evidence is split between one strong recommendation and one warning, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Grading is strict because reviews explicitly call her a and .

Format shift

Strict-grading evidence comes mainly from online reviews, while the .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Workload is heavy because students mention , and lots of writing.

Format shift

Online workload is clearly heavy, and the of work.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Teaching is strong for serious students because lectures are helpful and , but the class is demanding.

Format shift

and helpful lectures despite rigor, while the and supportive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears dominated by writing assignments, essays, homework, reading, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single in-person review says she is nice, flexible about catching up, and .

Main concern

The class still has a lot of work even in person.

What students said

“Although there is a lot of work, she checks them and gives feedbacks to make your work better.”
ENG1A
“she gave me lots of time to catch up.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews describe a rigorous writing course with , Turnitin, and useful feedback.

Main concern

The online workload and grading are heavy, with no mentioned.

What students said

“Took the 6 week summer course, which is understandably rigorous (3 essays, daily HW)”
ENGL01A
“ , and know that she reads your papers word for word.”
ENGLISH1A
“No , it is what it is.”
ENGLISH1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an exam format or proctoring policy, but .

Exam Policy Not Clearly ProvenTurnitin For Papers

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , quiz, midterm, final, open-book, or proctoring policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews mention Turnitin for papers but do not clearly prove webcam .

Turnitin For PapersExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Everything is turned into turnitin.”
ENGLISH1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and know that she reads your papers word for word.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course fit. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Lectures are straightforward and very helpful and its easy to reach out if you need help.”

📚 Workload Intensity

25/100

“Took the 6 week summer course, which is understandably rigorous (3 essays, daily HW)”

⚖️

24/100

“ , and know that she reads your papers word for word.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫

  • She gives a lot of and essays so use it to your advantage.
  • she checks them and gives feedbacks to make your work better
  • expect feedback, and know that .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Took the 6 week summer course, which is understandably rigorous (3 essays, daily HW)
  • Class is heavy on writing so manage your time.
  • Prepare for lots of reading.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Difficulty

  • Dont procrastinate in this class.
  • No , it is what it is.
  • Not for beginners.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because only 3 reviews are available, though they are detailed and internally consistent about workload and feedback.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A1 review
ENGL01A1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values