AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Dannette Isom-Norman

CD30 · CHDEV3024133 · CHDEV30 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if possible, but be cautious with online sections because the online review reports repetitive work and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrong FeedbackCaring In PersonAmazing LecturesGenerous In-Person GradingUneven Online Experience
  • , and care.
  • The only online review is strongly negative and says discussion boards and .
  • Attendance and participation mattered in at least one in-person course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

, but the online review reports unfair grading, so an A likely depends heavily on format.

Online evidence is negative about grading, while and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The content appears manageable, but online repetition and tedious than easy.

Online comments emphasize frustration with repeated discussion prompts, while and helpful guidance.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

day for showing up, so attendance appears important.

; the online review does not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

, but the single online review is strongly negative.

, while the only online review recommends caution.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

, but the online review says grading is unfair.

Format shift

Leniency evidence is positive in person and negative online.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload seems manageable in person, while the online review .

Format shift

Online workload sounds repetitive, while as heavy.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

, and care, despite one harsh online complaint.

Format shift

Teaching is praised in person but criticized online.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mainly mention papers, assignments, discussion boards, participation, and .

Format shift

Online evidence centers on discussion boards, while , and one test.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students describe her as , and .

Main concern

Participation may be expected for .

What students said

“She gives amazing lectures and provides great information on each topic.”
CHDEV3024133
“ , and is a .”
CD30
“ .”
CHDEV30

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review is negative and and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“She is a horrible teacher.”
CD30
“Then she grades unfairly”
CD30

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention one test but do not clearly prove the overall exam .

One Test MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention needing the book for one test, but do not clearly prove the .

One Test Mentioned
“Only needed the book for .”
CD30

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She gives amazing lectures and provides great information on each topic.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She gives amazing lectures and provides great information on each topic.”

⚖️

70/100

“ , and is a .”

⚠️ Online Concern

35/100

“Then she grades unfairly”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She gives amazing lectures and provides great information on each topic.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 And Work

  • , and is a .
  • Then she grades unfairly

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and understanding.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews are available, but the .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CD302 reviews
CHDEV301 review
CHDEV30241331 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values