AI Rate Professor

Journalism

Anthony Losongco

JOURN3 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take Anthony Losongco only if you like journalism and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing by formatTough online gradingHelpful in personWriting-heavyJournalism experience matters
  • Online feedback is strongly negative, with a student .
  • The and describes him as .
  • Success seems tied to prior journalism interest or experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting a strong grade appears difficult online because mistakes cost points, while the .

Online evidence is harsh and grade-risky, while but based on one review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course is challenging for beginners because journalism skills and writing accuracy matter a lot.

The online review makes the course sound difficult, while the who love journalism.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Neither the online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation depends heavily on format and fit, with one online student warning against it and one in-person student praising him.

Online feedback is avoidant, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

The online review says mistakes cost the grade, while the but .

Format shift

, while in-person evidence is more balanced.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The online review cites lots of homework and many papers, though the .

Format shift

Workload sounds heavy online and moderate in person.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

Teaching reviews are split between a and a poor online experience for beginners.

Format shift

In-person teaching is praised, while online support and difficulty are viewed negatively.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The course appears assignment- and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The and assignments are manageable if you enjoy journalism.

Main concern

The sample is only one review, so reliability is limited.

What students said

“He's a real cool guy.”
JOURN3
“ if you have any questions on an assignment”
JOURN3

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The online review says the class is extremely difficult for students without journalism experience and punishes mistakes harshly.

Main concern

and workload can feel unforgiving for beginners.

What students said

“If you have no experience in journalism or have taken a .”
JOURN3
“Mistakes honestly cost your grade,the ”
JOURN3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , open-book rules, or final exam requirements.

Online

The online review does not clearly describe exams, proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mistakes honestly cost your grade,the ”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the split between online difficulty and in-person support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“ if you have any questions on an assignment”

⚖️

30/100

“Mistakes honestly cost your grade,the ”

👍 Recommendation Fit

50/100

“especially if you love journalism.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Support

  • He's a real cool guy.
  • if you have any questions on an assignment

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • .
  • Mistakes honestly cost your grade,the
  • the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews exist and they sharply conflict by format, so conclusions are tentative.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

JOURN32 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values