AI Rate Professor

English

Shushanek Silvas

ENGL25336 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid Shushanek Silvas online unless , and limited communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderUnclear InstructionsPoor CommunicationDisorganized Modules
  • The online review strongly .
  • Instructions and modules are described as inconsistent and confusing.
  • The professor is described as demanding about citations and annotations while responding inconsistently to emails.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A appears very hard because the professor is called a and requires perfect citations and annotations.

All evidence comes from one online review, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The difficulty comes less from content and , and strict expectations.

Course difficulty evidence comes only from the online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The , so flexibility is not clearly proven.

No online or .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only reviewer because the professor is unclear, inconsistent, and hard to communicate with.

Recommendation evidence comes from one online review only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

The and demand for perfect citations and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The review mentions multiple essays, citations, annotations, and .

Format shift

All workload evidence is from one online review.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

The reviewer describes unclear teaching, incorrect modules, inconsistent requirements, and poor email response.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is from one online review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

The , and modules rather than exams.

Format shift

All assessment evidence is from one online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review describes a disorganized and frustrating course with and .

Main concern

, and selective email replies.

What students said

“ .”
ENGL25336
“This teacher is not specific at all”
ENGL25336
“ .”
ENGL25336

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book policy, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review discusses essays and modules but does not clearly prove exam format, webcam use, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“Her syallbus say 5 essays but her modules say 3.”
ENGL25336

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“This teacher is not specific at all”

⚖️

10/100

“Her work sited and annotation, she needs them to be perfect.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This teacher is not specific at all
  • some her modules is incorrect because she used the same one from last time.

Theme 2

📧 About Communication

  • i have emailed her a few times and .
  • Her syallbus say 5 essays but her modules say 3.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Her work sited and annotation, she needs them to be perfect.
  • She too extra.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, so the warning is strong but the sample is very limited.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL253361 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values