AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Nell Papavasiliou

ECE2 · ENGR2 · ENGR10 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a deeply supportive engineering professor who still expects careful, precise work.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring MentorClear ExplanationsHands-On HelpEngineering OpportunitiesDetail-Oriented Grading
  • Every review gives top teaching marks and describes her as caring, helpful, and clear.
  • Engineering graphics can start with a , but she breaks material down well.
  • Grades reward careful work because small .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

High grades are common, but students need careful, consistent work because small .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The material has a real learning curve, especially AutoCAD, but .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Reviews imply class participation matters for learning, but they do not clearly prove a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

100/100

Students unanimously recommend her because , and invested in student success.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

but detail-oriented, with deductions for and feedback.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload appears steady and sometimes homework-heavy, especially in technical drafting courses.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

100/100

Students consistently describe her as , and one of the .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and midterms, suggesting a balanced assessment mix.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

gives strong feedback, helps struggling students, and connects students to engineering opportunities.

Main concern

Students should expect detailed work and .

What students said

“AutoCAD has a , but she was really good at breaking down the material”
ENGR2
“ by 1 or 2 points because of little mistakes”
ENGR2
“ and come over and help you”
ENGR2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, but one review says she tells students exactly .

Midterm Topics Clearly AnnouncedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

content, and they do not prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Midterm Topics Clearly AnnouncedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring Policy
“Tells you exactly what is going .”
ENGR10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easily the . Period.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and engineering preparation; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

100/100

“Easily the . Period.”

❤️ Student Support

100/100

“ and come over and help you”

📈 Difficulty & Precision

70/100

“ by 1 or 2 points because of little mistakes”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and easy to understand.
  • she was really good at breaking down the material to make it easier to understand.
  • Actually believes that a professors goal is to educate

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • Works with struggling students, is respectful even when being disrespected.
  • She cares about helping students learn and prepare for their further as engineers.
  • Very helpful and understanding teacher.

Theme 3

📐 About Engineering Work

  • AutoCAD has a
  • We engineers cant afford mistakes !!
  • Always always ANSI! Youre in good hands with Papavasiliou.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Nine detailed and , but the sample is modest and ends in 2019.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR25 reviews
ENGR103 reviews
ECE21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values