AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Melinda Brewer

CD30 · CD17B · CD6 · CD5 · CHDEV30 · CHDEV3380 · CDABC · CD20 · CD7 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
88.89%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you will attend, read, and keep up with weekly work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and engagingClear lecturesMandatory attendanceWeekly quizzesFair grading
  • Students overwhelmingly praise her caring style and engaging lectures.
  • Grades are fair but , and portfolio work.
  • The single online review is negative because the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic if , and finish projects, but it is not effortless.

The Easy A evidence comes almost entirely from in-person reviews, while the lone .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The content is usually manageable and clearly explained, but , and portfolio work add structure and challenge.

In-person reviews describe manageable course content, while the online review focuses on Canvas confusion rather than content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Many in-person reviews say attendance is mandatory and .

Attendance concerns are strongly supported by in-person reviews; the online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

89/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and fair when students keep up.

, while the only online review is negative and lowers confidence for online sections.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

as clear and fair, but not very forgiving if students miss work or details.

Format shift

, while the online review gives no useful grading evidence.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload is steady with weekly quizzes, reading, activities, and major portfolio or paper assignments.

Format shift

, while the online review only mentions setup confusion.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most students describe her as , and passionate in class.

Format shift

, but the only online review reports a poor setup experience.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment appears balanced across , and a final.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide the assessment evidence; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students usually describe her as , and fair, with and steady quizzes.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“Dr. Brewer is wonderful! Her lectures are informative and she's funny!”
CD17B
“ and you will use the book for her quizzes.”
CD30
“This class is NOT a fly-by-night or easy A.”
CHDEV3380

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review reports early confusion with Canvas setup and unavailable quizzes.

Main concern

and unreliable in the only review.

What students said

“the way she has things set ”
CHDEV30

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, tests, projects, and a final, but do .

Weekly QuizzesFinal MentionedPortfolio ProjectReading-Based Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesFinal MentionedPortfolio ProjectReading-Based Tests
“ .”
CD6
“The portfolio is the main this for this class”
CD30
“Participate in class and study for the final.”
CD5

Online

The online review mentions an unavailable quiz but does not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or .

Unpublished Quiz
“she posted a but ”
CHDEV30

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Fantastic teacher. Loved her and her class! . But be prepared to work hard and actually learn something.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Dr. Brewer is wonderful! Her lectures are informative and she's funny!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

89/100

“ ”

⚖️

62/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She lectures with great passion.
  • and easy to understand.
  • She gives real life examples.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Weekly quizzes.
  • Do the to class, and do your assignments.
  • this course is very demanding so

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • Easy A if you read and attend.
  • The and I .
  • This class is NOT a fly-by-night or easy A.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 31 reviews span many years and show , and workload.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CD3013 reviews
CD510 reviews
CD202 reviews
CD17B1 review
CD61 review
Show 4 more courses
CD71 review
CDABC1 review
CHDEV301 review
CHDEV33801 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values