AI Rate Professor

History

Evia Rodriguez

HIS11 · HISTORY11 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Rodriguez if you can attend consistently and follow the study guides, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardKind but firmStudy guides matterAttendance sensitiveClear exam prep
  • Study guides closely support the two non-cumulative exams.
  • The workload is manageable if students keep up with posted lectures and assigned work.
  • Missing too much class can seriously hurt the grade, with limited flexibility reported.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A seems reachable with and study guides, but missed class can quickly remove that path.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course content is not described as hard, and the work is framed as manageable when students keep up.

Only in-person comments describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

because one student failed after missing too much class and reported little recovery support.

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Students are split because and clear while another felt unsupported during personal problems.

The mixed recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Grading seems fair for students who do the work, but not lenient for .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

65/100

Students describe posted lectures, study guides, and .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Teaching is helped by kindness and , but flexibility and support are disputed.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

The clearest assessment .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

study guides but low tolerance for missed class.

Main concern

Students who miss significant class time may struggle to recover their grade.

What students said

“As long as you do the study guide you have nothing to worry about on the 2 exams”
HISTORY11
“she said I had missed to much class”
HIS11

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support two non-cumulative exams based on study guides, but .

Two Non-Cumulative ExamsStudy Guide Based

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention two non-cumulative exams and study guides, with .

Two Non-Cumulative ExamsStudy Guide Based
“2 exams (not cumulative)”
HISTORY11
“As long as you do the study guide you have nothing to worry about”
HISTORY11

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Youd only fail if you dont do her work which honestly isnt that difficult she doesnt ask for much”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Communication is key with her! ”

📘

62/100

“As long as you do the study guide you have nothing to worry about on the 2 exams”

⚠️

18/100

“she said I had missed to much class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures
  • Communication is key with her!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Youd only fail if you dont do her work which honestly isnt that difficult she doesnt ask for much
  • she said I had missed to much class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, and they sharply disagree on the experience.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HIS111 review
HISTORY111 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values