AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Creigh Polanowsky

GRC22 · GRC20 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you like a friendly instructor, but do not rely on last-minute help if you fall behind.

Best fit · Effort For RewardSweet PersonalityEnthusiasticLimited Help When BehindParticipation Matters
  • Students describe him as friendly and enthusiastic.
  • , but one student felt unsupported after falling behind.
  • The limited evidence suggests moderate difficulty and uncertain grade safety.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The only reported grade is an F, and one student warned that falling behind was hard to recover from.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course seems moderately difficult, with no comments describing the material as extremely easy or hard.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

One review tags participation as important, but comments .

, and there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students like his personality, but the support concern and one failed grade weaken the recommendation.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

The single reported grade is an F, and comments .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reviews .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Students describe him as sweet, funny, enthusiastic, and knowledgeable, though support may be inconsistent.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and knowledgeable instructor, with concern about limited help when a student falls behind.

Main concern

Support may not be enough if you get behind.

What students said

“Great teacher hes really sweet hes funny just doesnt help much when you need it if you fall behind”
GRC20
“Very enthusiastic about the subject matter and more than willing to provide extra help when needed.”
GRC22

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great teacher hes really sweet hes funny just doesnt help much when you need it if you fall behind”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Very enthusiastic about the subject matter and more than willing to provide extra help when needed.”

⚠️ Support Risk

35/100

“Great teacher hes really sweet hes funny just doesnt help much when you need it if you fall behind”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great teacher hes really sweet hes funny just doesnt help much when you need it if you fall behind
  • Very enthusiastic about the subject matter and more than willing to provide extra help when needed.

Theme 2

📈 About Help And Grades

  • just doesnt help much when you need it if you fall behind
  • more than willing to provide extra help when needed

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, and one is old and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

GRC201 review
GRC221 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values