AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Steve Henkel

ACCTG4A · ACCTG51 · ACCTG31 · ACCTG4B · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can learn from the book, pay close attention in class, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProKnowledgeable but repetitiveTextbook heavyTangent proneHelpful in labTest based grading
  • Students describe him as knowledgeable and good-natured, but lectures can drift and feel .
  • , and lab work, which hurts students who are not strong test takers.
  • because he is willing to help with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A appears hard unless you are comfortable with , and independent practice.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The content is not always conceptually extreme, but weak lecture structure and textbook dependence make it harder to absorb.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

One review directly warns that skipping class will likely cause failure, and several comments stress paying attention in class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Students appreciate his kindness and knowledge, but the clearest recommendation warns against taking him if .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

, and and little evidence of leniency.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Work centers on textbook tasks, lab work, quizzes, and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

He is knowledgeable and , but lectures are repetitive, tangent-heavy, and sometimes hard to sit through.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and in-class assignments.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews show a knowledgeable but .

Main concern

Lectures can be repetitive, tangent-heavy, and not enough preparation for tests.

What students said

“He only lectures during class; .”
ACCTG51
“he is very knowledgeable on it!”
ACCTG31
“The , as it allows for hands-on help, but the lecture was hard to sit through.”
ACCTG4A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests, quizzes, and in-class assignment based exams, but do .

TestsQuizzesLab WorkIn-Class Assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention test, quiz, lab, and in-class assignment .

TestsQuizzesLab WorkIn-Class Assignments
“ , and lab work.”
ACCTG51
“ .”
ACCTG4B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are not a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and lab support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“He is very willing to help with .”

⚖️

30/100

“ , and lab work.”

🧭 Lecture Style

52/100

“Is a pretty good lecturer, but tends to go off on LONG tangents if the students will allow.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He only lectures during class; .
  • This teacher loves to repeat himself when speaking about Quickbooks but he is very knowledgeable on it!
  • Goes off on tangents.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you are not a .
  • .
  • The class material was to do whatever the book told us to and print it.

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • Very kind and will try to help as much as he can.
  • He is very willing to help with .
  • Good-natured guy, good sense of humor, easy to get along with.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

and some are old, but they consistently describe textbook-heavy teaching and uneven lecture value.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCTG311 review
ACCTG4A1 review
ACCTG4B1 review
ACCTG511 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1