AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Laura Musselman

PHIL1A · PHIL2 · PHIL2A · PHIL1C · PHILOSOPHY2 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take her if you can keep up with readings and essays, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough Essay GraderReading HeavyClear PhilosopherDiscussion PointsWork For Grade
  • Students generally respect her knowledge and clarity, especially for a difficult subject.
  • , and careful essays.
  • The and tests.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Students can do fine with effort, but , and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The and several students say tests, essays, and readings are difficult.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

, but students say skipping class makes tests much harder.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend her because and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Many reviews call her a and tests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students report lots of , and long papers.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students often describe her as , and helpful with difficult philosophy material.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear to come , and participation.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a knowledgeable and nice professor , and strong essays.

Main concern

Essay and and unclear.

What students said

“She really makes you work for your grade, but overall really good!”
PHIL1C
“The professor is a of the test.”
PHIL1C

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and essay portions but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Tough TestsEssay PortionsNo Clear Study Guide

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and essay portions, but exam policy details are not clearly proven.

Tough TestsEssay Portions
“ . .”
PHIL1C
“doesn't give a study guide or doesn't go into detail about what's going to be on the tests”
PHIL 1C

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She really makes you work for your grade, but overall really good!”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ ”

⚖️

28/100

“The professor is a of the test.”

📚 Reading Load

34/100

“Make sure you do the readings because it will help A LOT.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and knows her stuff!!!
  • Musselman is a good professor given the rather boring subject.
  • musselman is a good straight up teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She really makes you work for your grade, but overall really good!
  • and doesn't give a study guide
  • she is tough on the papers but she wants you to actually try.

Theme 3

📚

  • Make sure you do the readings because it will help A LOT.
  • Read or feel dumb in class.
  • You'll do fine if you read your book.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews across several years provide , and exams.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1C6 reviews
PHIL2A2 reviews
PHIL 1C1 review
PHIL1A1 review
PHIL21 review
Show 1 more courses
PHILOSOPHY21 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2